Literature DB >> 15666298

Inter- and intralaboratory variation of in vitro diffusion cell measurements: an international multicenter study using quasi-standardized methods and materials.

R P Chilcott1, N Barai, A E Beezer, S I Brain, M B Brown, A L Bunge, S E Burgess, S Cross, C H Dalton, M Dias, A Farinha, B C Finnin, S J Gallagher, D M Green, H Gunt, R L Gwyther, C M Heard, C A Jarvis, F Kamiyama, G B Kasting, E E Ley, S T Lim, G S McNaughton, A Morris, M H Nazemi, M A Pellett, J Du Plessis, Y S Quan, S L Raghavan, M Roberts, W Romonchuk, C S Roper, D Schenk, L Simonsen, A Simpson, B D Traversa, L Trottet, A Watkinson, S C Wilkinson, F M Williams, A Yamamoto, J Hadgraft.   

Abstract

In vitro measurements of skin absorption are an increasingly important aspect of regulatory studies, product support claims, and formulation screening. However, such measurements are significantly affected by skin variability. The purpose of this study was to determine inter- and intralaboratory variation in diffusion cell measurements caused by factors other than skin. This was attained through the use of an artificial (silicone rubber) rate-limiting membrane and the provision of materials including a standard penetrant, methyl paraben (MP), and a minimally prescriptive protocol to each of the 18 participating laboratories. "Standardized" calculations of MP flux were determined from the data submitted by each laboratory by applying a predefined mathematical model. This was deemed necessary to eliminate any interlaboratory variation caused by different methods of flux calculations. Average fluxes of MP calculated and reported by each laboratory (60 +/- 27 microg cm(-2) h(-1), n = 25, range 27-101) were in agreement with the standardized calculations of MP flux (60 +/- 21 microg cm(-2) h(-1), range 19-120). The coefficient of variation between laboratories was approximately 35% and was manifest as a fourfold difference between the lowest and highest average flux values and a sixfold difference between the lowest and highest individual flux values. Intralaboratory variation was lower, averaging 10% for five individuals using the same equipment within a single laboratory. Further studies should be performed to clarify the exact components responsible for nonskin-related variability in diffusion cell measurements. It is clear that further developments of in vitro methodologies for measuring skin absorption are required. Copyright 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc. and the American Pharmacists Association.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15666298     DOI: 10.1002/jps.20229

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharm Sci        ISSN: 0022-3549            Impact factor:   3.534


  7 in total

1.  Validation of a static Franz diffusion cell system for in vitro permeation studies.

Authors:  Shiow-Fern Ng; Jennifer J Rouse; Francis D Sanderson; Victor Meidan; Gillian M Eccleston
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 3.246

2.  A Microfluidic Diffusion Cell for Fast and Easy Percutaneous Absorption Assays.

Authors:  Christophe Provin; Alexandre Nicolas; Sébastien Grégoire; Teruo Fujii
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2015-02-28       Impact factor: 4.200

3.  Nonlinear quantitative structure-property relationship modeling of skin permeation coefficient.

Authors:  Brian J Neely; Sundararajan V Madihally; Robert L Robinson; Khaled A M Gasem
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.534

4.  Evaluation of absorbent materials for use as ad hoc dry decontaminants during mass casualty incidents as part of the UK's Initial Operational Response (IOR).

Authors:  Nick Kassouf; Sara Syed; Joanne Larner; Richard Amlôt; Robert P Chilcott
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Hybrid in vitro diffusion cell for simultaneous evaluation of hair and skin decontamination: temporal distribution of chemical contaminants.

Authors:  Hazem Matar; Nevine Amer; Sneha Kansagra; Andreia Pinhal; Elliot Thomas; Scott Townend; Joanne Larner; Robert P Chilcott
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Polystyrene microsphere and 5-fluorouracil release from custom-designed wound dressing films.

Authors:  Maryam Mobed-Miremadi; Raki Komarla Nagendra; Sujana Lakshmi Ramachandruni; Jason James Rook; Mallika Keralapura; Michel Goedert
Journal:  Prog Biomater       Date:  2013-01-24

7.  Measurement of the penetration of 56 cosmetic relevant chemicals into and through human skin using a standardized protocol.

Authors:  Nicola J Hewitt; Sébastien Grégoire; Richard Cubberley; Hélène Duplan; Joan Eilstein; Corie Ellison; Cathy Lester; Eric Fabian; Julien Fernandez; Camille Géniès; Carine Jacques-Jamin; Martina Klaric; Helga Rothe; Ian Sorrell; Daniela Lange; Andreas Schepky
Journal:  J Appl Toxicol       Date:  2019-12-22       Impact factor: 3.446

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.