C A Barber1, K Margolis, R V Luepker, D K Arnett. 1. Division of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55454, USA. barber@epi.umn.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The Women's Health Initiative (WHI) Data Safety and Monitoring Board terminated the trial arm of the estrogen plus progestin combined hormone therapy early after observing an excess of harm relative to benefit of this therapy. METHODS: To learn how postmenopausal hormone therapy (PMT) use in a community setting was affected by the WHI results, we resurveyed current users of PMT in August 2002 to January 2003 after publication of the WHI findings from our Minnesota Heart Survey (MHS) cohort (2000-2002), a cross-sectional epidemiological survey in the Minneapolis-St. Paul, Minnesota, area. We evaluated women's interpretation of the WHI results, reports of their physicians' recommendations, and the impact of these on PMT use in this group. RESULTS: We obtained an excellent response rate (97.9%, 185 of 189). Almost a third of women with an intact uterus but few women with a hysterectomy discontinued their PMT regimen within the first 6 months after the WHI research results were released. The majority of women in our study consulted their physician about whether to discontinue PMT. Women in the intact uterus group who started their PMT regimen for menopausal symptoms were less likely to discontinue PMT. Of women who continued their PMT regimen, the majority cited relief of menopausal symptoms or physician recommendation for continuation of PMT or both. Almost a third of the women interviewed reported being confused, worried, or nervous about the media reports of the WHI results. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest effective dissemination of WHI information by the media and physicians and significant changes in patterns of PMT use in the community.
BACKGROUND: The Women's Health Initiative (WHI) Data Safety and Monitoring Board terminated the trial arm of the estrogen plus progestin combined hormone therapy early after observing an excess of harm relative to benefit of this therapy. METHODS: To learn how postmenopausal hormone therapy (PMT) use in a community setting was affected by the WHI results, we resurveyed current users of PMT in August 2002 to January 2003 after publication of the WHI findings from our Minnesota Heart Survey (MHS) cohort (2000-2002), a cross-sectional epidemiological survey in the Minneapolis-St. Paul, Minnesota, area. We evaluated women's interpretation of the WHI results, reports of their physicians' recommendations, and the impact of these on PMT use in this group. RESULTS: We obtained an excellent response rate (97.9%, 185 of 189). Almost a third of women with an intact uterus but few women with a hysterectomy discontinued their PMT regimen within the first 6 months after the WHI research results were released. The majority of women in our study consulted their physician about whether to discontinue PMT. Women in the intact uterus group who started their PMT regimen for menopausal symptoms were less likely to discontinue PMT. Of women who continued their PMT regimen, the majority cited relief of menopausal symptoms or physician recommendation for continuation of PMT or both. Almost a third of the women interviewed reported being confused, worried, or nervous about the media reports of the WHI results. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest effective dissemination of WHI information by the media and physicians and significant changes in patterns of PMT use in the community.
Authors: Katherine M Newton; Susan D Reed; Larissa Nekhyludov; Louis C Grothaus; Evette J Ludman; Kelly Ehrlich; Andrea Z LaCroix Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2014-01-20 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: Nanette Santoro; Amanda Allshouse; Genevieve Neal-Perry; Lubna Pal; Rogerio A Lobo; Frederick Naftolin; Dennis M Black; Eliot A Brinton; Matthew J Budoff; Marcelle I Cedars; N Maritza Dowling; Mary Dunn; Carey E Gleason; Howard N Hodis; Barbara Isaac; Maureen Magnani; JoAnn E Manson; Virginia M Miller; Hugh S Taylor; Whitney Wharton; Erin Wolff; Viola Zepeda; S Mitchell Harman Journal: Menopause Date: 2017-03 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Susan D Reed; Diana S M Buist; Melissa L Anderson; Erin J Aiello Bowles; Dawn Fitzgibbons; Deborah Seger; Katherine M Newton Journal: Menopause Date: 2009 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: B B Bendlin; C M Carlsson; C E Gleason; S C Johnson; A Sodhi; C L Gallagher; L Puglielli; C D Engelman; M L Ries; G Xu; W Wharton; S Asthana Journal: Maturitas Date: 2009-12-30 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: A Lum Han; Hee Kyung Lee; Hyun Soo Chon; Hyun Ock Pae; Min Sun Kim; Yong Il Shin; Sooah Kim Journal: Nutrients Date: 2022-07-13 Impact factor: 6.706