Literature DB >> 15665010

Recombinant luteinizing hormone supplementation to recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone induced ovarian hyperstimulation in the GnRH-antagonist multiple-dose protocol.

G Griesinger1, A Schultze-Mosgau, K Dafopoulos, A Schroeder, A Schroer, S von Otte, D Hornung, K Diedrich, R Felberbaum.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Suppression of endogenous LH production by mid-follicular phase GnRH-antagonist administration in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation protocol using recombinant (rec) FSH preparations void of LH activity may potentially affect ovarian response and the outcome of IVF treatment. The present study prospectively assessed the effect of using a combination of recFSH and recLH on ovarian stimulation parameters and treatment outcome in a fixed GnRH-antagonist multiple dose protocol.
METHODS: 127 infertile patients with an indication for IVF or ICSI were recruited and randomized (using sealed envelopes) to receive a starting dose of either 150 IU recFSH (follitropin alpha) or 150 IU recFSH plus 75 IU recLH (lutropin alpha) for ovarian hyperstimulation. GnRH-antagonist (Cetrorelix) 0.25 mg was administered daily from stimulation day 6 onwards up to and including the day of the administration of recombinant HCG (chorion gonadotropin alpha). Gonadotropin dose adjustments were allowed from stimulation day 6 onwards, HCG was administered as soon as three follicles > or =18 mm were present. The primary outcome parameter was treatment duration until administration of HCG.
RESULTS: Exogenous LH did not shorten the time necessary to reach ovulation induction criteria. Serum estradiol (E(2)) and LH levels were significantly higher on the day of HCG administration in the recLH-supplemented group (1924.7 +/- 1256.4 vs 1488.3 +/- 824.0 pg/ml, P < 0.03), and 2.1 +/- 1.4 vs 1.4 +/- 1.5 IU/l, P < 0.01, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Except for higher E(2) and LH levels on the day of HCG administration, no positive trend in favour of additional LH was found as defined by treatment outcome parameters.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15665010     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deh741

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  15 in total

1.  Does lower dose of long-acting triptorelin maintain pituitary suppression and produce good live birth rate in long down-regulation protocol for in-vitro fertilization?

Authors:  Xin Chen; Shu-Xian Feng; Ping-Ping Guo; Yu-Xia He; Yu-Dong Liu; De-Sheng Ye; Shi-Ling Chen
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2016-04-13

2.  Mitogen-activated protein kinase regulates FSH-induced expression of tissue-type plasminogen activator through an activator protein 1 response element.

Authors:  Wei Yang; Cui-Ling Lu; Fu-Qing Yu; Tao Liu; Zhao-Yuan Hu; Yi-Xun Liu
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2008-11-04       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 3.  Lutropin alfa.

Authors:  Sohita Dhillon; Gillian M Keating
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 4.  Different ovarian stimulation protocols for women with diminished ovarian reserve.

Authors:  D Loutradis; P Drakakis; E Vomvolaki; A Antsaklis
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2007-11-22       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Efficacy of low dose hCG on oocyte maturity for ovarian stimulation in poor responder women undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycle: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Tahereh Madani; Ladan Mohammadi Yeganeh; Shabnam Khodabakhshi; Mohammad Reza Akhoond; Fatemeh Hasani
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2012-09-07       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Follicular fluid hormonal profile and cumulus cell gene expression in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation with recombinant FSH: effects of recombinant LH administration.

Authors:  Marzia Barberi; Beatrice Ermini; Maria Beatrice Morelli; Michele Ermini; Sandra Cecconi; Rita Canipari
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  Balancing selected medication costs with total number of daily injections: a preference analysis of GnRH-agonist and antagonist protocols by IVF patients.

Authors:  E Scott Sills; Gary S Collins; Shala A Salem; Christopher A Jones; Alison C Peck; Rifaat D Salem
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2012-08-30       Impact factor: 5.211

8.  Comparison of FSH and hMG on ovarian stimulation outcome with a GnRH antagonist protocol in younger and advanced reproductive age women.

Authors:  Chisa Tabata; Toshihiro Fujiwara; Miki Sugawa; Momo Noma; Hiroki Onoue; Maki Kusumi; Noriko Watanabe; Takako Kurosawa; Osamu Tsutsumi
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2014-07-11

9.  Recombinant human luteinizing hormone co-treatment in ovarian stimulation for assisted reproductive technology in women of advanced reproductive age: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Alessandro Conforti; Sandro C Esteves; Peter Humaidan; Salvatore Longobardi; Thomas D'Hooghe; Raoul Orvieto; Alberto Vaiarelli; Danilo Cimadomo; Laura Rienzi; Filippo Maria Ubaldi; Fulvio Zullo; Carlo Alviggi
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 5.211

Review 10.  Recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone (r-hFSH) plus recombinant luteinizing hormone versus r-hFSH alone for ovarian stimulation during assisted reproductive technology: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Philippe Lehert; Efstratios M Kolibianakis; Christos A Venetis; Joan Schertz; Helen Saunders; Pablo Arriagada; Samuel Copt; Basil Tarlatzis
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 5.211

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.