Literature DB >> 15664287

Computer-assisted quantitative assessment of power Doppler US: effects of microbubble contrast agent in the differentiation of breast tumors.

Joachim Kettenbach1, Thomas H Helbich, Sabine Huber, Ivan Zuna, Wolfgang Dock.   

Abstract

RATIONALE AND
OBJECTIVES: To objectively quantify the effects of a microbubble contrast agent to differentiate breast tumors with power doppler ultrasound and to compare these results with color doppler ultrasound (CD US).
METHODS: In 47 patients a microbubble contrast agent was injected intravenously. Computer-assisted quantitative assessment of the color pixel density was performed to evaluate the increase in Doppler signals. Results were compared to previously published results of a color Doppler ultrasound study.
RESULTS: Peak color pixel density at contrast-enhanced power Doppler ultrasound was higher for carcinomas than for benign tumors (P < 0.03). Time to peak enhancement was shorter in carcinomas than in benign tumors (P < 0.01). For both parameters, diagnostic accuracy of power Doppler ultrasound was 69 and 78%, and for color Doppler ultrasound 62 and 76%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Quantitative assessment of contrast-enhanced power Doppler ultrasound showed significant differences in malignant and benign breast tumors. Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced power Doppler ultrasound was higher compared to color Doppler ultrasound.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15664287     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2004.04.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  13 in total

Review 1.  [Imaging of molecular structures of breasts with new sonography techniques].

Authors:  M Reisegger; G Schueller; R Gruber; K Pinker; C Riedl; T H Helbich
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  Comparing contrast-enhanced color flow imaging and pathological measures of breast lesion vascularity.

Authors:  Flemming Forsberg; Babita Kuruvilla; Mark B Pascua; Manisha H Chaudhari; Daniel A Merton; Juan P Palazzo; Barry B Goldberg
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2008-04-24       Impact factor: 2.998

3.  Predictive model for contrast-enhanced ultrasound of the breast: Is it feasible in malignant risk assessment of breast imaging reporting and data system 4 lesions?

Authors:  Jun Luo; Ji-Dong Chen; Qing Chen; Lin-Xian Yue; Guo Zhou; Cheng Lan; Yi Li; Chi-Hua Wu; Jing-Qiao Lu
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2016-06-28

4.  Diagnosis of solid breast tumors using vessel analysis in three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound images.

Authors:  Yan-Hao Huang; Jeon-Hor Chen; Yeun-Chung Chang; Chiun-Sheng Huang; Woo Kyung Moon; Wen-Jia Kuo; Kuan-Ju Lai; Ruey-Feng Chang
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Quantitative Multiparametric Breast Ultrasound: Application of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound and Elastography Leads to an Improved Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Lesions.

Authors:  Panagiotis Kapetas; Paola Clauser; Ramona Woitek; Georg J Wengert; Mathias Lazar; Katja Pinker; Thomas H Helbich; Pascal A T Baltzer
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 6.016

6.  Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound parametric imaging in breast tumors.

Authors:  Zhang Yuan; Jiang Quan; Zhang Yunxiao; Chen Jian; He Zhu; Gong Liping
Journal:  J Breast Cancer       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 3.588

7.  Contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the characterisation of breast masses: utility of quantitative analysis in comparison with MRI.

Authors:  Natalia Caproni; Francesca Marchisio; Annarita Pecchi; Barbara Canossi; Rachele Battista; Piero D'Alimonte; Pietro Torricelli
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Breast contrast-enhanced ultrasound: is a scoring system feasible? A preliminary study in China.

Authors:  Xiaoyun Xiao; Bing Ou; Haiyun Yang; Huan Wu; Baoming Luo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-18       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Does contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) play a better role in diagnosis of breast lesions with calcification? A comparison with MRI.

Authors:  Jiamin Pan; Wenjuan Tong; Jia Luo; Jinyu Liang; Fushun Pan; Yanling Zheng; Xiaoyan Xie
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-06-02       Impact factor: 3.039

10.  Comparative study of thyroid puncture biopsy guided by contrast-enhanced ultrasonography and conventional ultrasound.

Authors:  Fengsheng Li; Huiting Luo
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 2.447

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.