Literature DB >> 15663950

The relationship between domain duplication and recombination.

Christine Vogel1, Sarah A Teichmann, Jose Pereira-Leal.   

Abstract

Protein domains represent the basic evolutionary units that form proteins. Domain duplication and shuffling by recombination are probably the most important forces driving protein evolution and hence the complexity of the proteome. While the duplication of whole genes as well as domain-encoding exons increases the abundance of domains in the proteome, domain shuffling increases versatility, i.e. the number of distinct contexts in which a domain can occur. Here, we describe a comprehensive, genome-wide analysis of the relationship between these two processes. We observe a strong and robust correlation between domain versatility and abundance: domains that occur more often also have many different combination partners. This supports the view that domain recombination occurs in a random way. However, we do not observe all the different combinations that are expected from a simple random recombination scenario, and this is due to frequent duplication of specific domain combinations. When we simulate the evolution of the protein repertoire considering stochastic recombination of domains followed by extensive duplication of the combinations, we approximate the observed data well. Our analyses are consistent with a stochastic process that governs domain recombination and thus protein divergence with respect to domains within a polypeptide chain. At the same time, they support a scenario in which domain combinations are formed only once during the evolution of the protein repertoire, and are then duplicated to various extents. The extent of duplication of different combinations varies widely and, in nature, will depend on selection for the domain combination based on its function. Some of the pair-wise domain combinations that are highly duplicated also recur frequently with other partner domains, and thus represent evolutionary units larger than single protein domains, which we term "supra-domains".

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15663950     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.11.050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  75 in total

1.  A domain-centric analysis of oomycete plant pathogen genomes reveals unique protein organization.

Authors:  Michael F Seidl; Guido Van den Ackerveken; Francine Govers; Berend Snel
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2010-11-30       Impact factor: 8.340

2.  Evolution and structural diversification of Nictaba-like lectin genes in food crops with a focus on soybean (Glycine max).

Authors:  Sofie Van Holle; Pierre Rougé; Els J M Van Damme
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 4.357

3.  Modeling the evolution of protein domain architectures using maximum parsimony.

Authors:  Jessica H Fong; Lewis Y Geer; Anna R Panchenko; Stephen H Bryant
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2006-11-10       Impact factor: 5.469

4.  Reductive evolution of architectural repertoires in proteomes and the birth of the tripartite world.

Authors:  Minglei Wang; Liudmila S Yafremava; Derek Caetano-Anollés; Jay E Mittenthal; Gustavo Caetano-Anollés
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2007-10-01       Impact factor: 9.043

5.  Evolution of protein domain promiscuity in eukaryotes.

Authors:  Malay Kumar Basu; Liran Carmel; Igor B Rogozin; Eugene V Koonin
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2008-01-29       Impact factor: 9.043

6.  Minimization of biosynthetic costs in adaptive gene expression responses of yeast to environmental changes.

Authors:  Ester Vilaprinyo; Rui Alves; Albert Sorribas
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-02-12       Impact factor: 4.475

7.  Projection of gene-protein networks to the functional space of the proteome and its application to analysis of organism complexity.

Authors:  Alexander A Kanapin; Nicola Mulder; Vladimir A Kuznetsov
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 3.969

8.  Expanding the landscape of chromatin modification (CM)-related functional domains and genes in human.

Authors:  Shuye Pu; Andrei L Turinsky; James Vlasblom; Tuan On; Xuejian Xiong; Andrew Emili; Zhaolei Zhang; Jack Greenblatt; John Parkinson; Shoshana J Wodak
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-11-29       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Protein comparison at the domain architecture level.

Authors:  Byungwook Lee; Doheon Lee
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  The evolutionary history of protein domains viewed by species phylogeny.

Authors:  Song Yang; Philip E Bourne
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-12-21       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.