Literature DB >> 15663765

Resolving controversies regarding hemodiafiltration versus hemodialysis: the Dutch Convective Transport Study.

E Lars Penne1, Peter J Blankestijn, Michiel L Bots, Marinus A van den Dorpel, Muriel P C Grooteman, Menso J Nubé, Piet M ter Wee.   

Abstract

Hemodialysis patients suffer from a high incidence of cardiovascular disease. Among the many predisposing factors, such as high blood pressure, dyslipidemia, and fluid overload, the accumulation of high molecular weight uremic toxins, the so-called middle molecules, may play an important role. Since convective therapies such as online hemodiafiltration have a better clearance profile for these compounds than standard hemodialysis, it has been suggested that these dialysis strategies may reduce cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. As reliable data on these issues are not available, the Dutch Convective Transport Study (CONTRAST) was recently initiated. This prospective randomized trial was designed to compare online hemodiafiltration with low-flux hemodialysis with respect to cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15663765     DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-139X.2005.18107.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Dial        ISSN: 0894-0959            Impact factor:   3.455


  7 in total

1.  A randomized trial of hemodiafiltration and change in cardiovascular parameters.

Authors:  Irina M Mostovaya; Michiel L Bots; Marinus A van den Dorpel; Muriel P C Grooteman; Otto Kamp; Renée Levesque; Piet M Ter Wee; Menso J Nubé; Peter J Blankestijn
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 2.  High-flux versus low-flux membranes for end-stage kidney disease.

Authors:  Suetonia C Palmer; Kannaiyan S Rabindranath; Jonathan C Craig; Paul J Roderick; Francesco Locatelli; Giovanni F M Strippoli
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-09-12

Review 3.  Renal replacement therapies.

Authors:  Gautam Phadke; Ramesh Khanna
Journal:  Mo Med       Date:  2011 Jan-Feb

Review 4.  The membrane perspective of uraemic toxins: which ones should, or can, be removed?

Authors:  Sudhir K Bowry; Peter Kotanko; Rainer Himmele; Xia Tao; Michael Anger
Journal:  Clin Kidney J       Date:  2021-12-27

5.  Long-term outcomes in online hemodiafiltration and high-flux hemodialysis: a comparative analysis.

Authors:  Enric Vilar; Andrew C Fry; David Wellsted; James E Tattersall; Roger N Greenwood; Ken Farrington
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2009-10-09       Impact factor: 8.237

6.  Multifactorial approach and superior treatment efficacy in renal patients with the aid of nurse practitioners. Design of The MASTERPLAN Study [ISRCTN73187232].

Authors:  Arjan D van Zuilen; Ingeborgh van der Tweel; Peter J Blankestijn; Michiel L Bots; Marjolijn van Buren; Marc A G J ten Dam; Karin A H Kaasjager; Peter J G van de Ven; Gerald Vervoort; Louis-Jean Vleming; Gerry Ligtenberg; Jack F M Wetzels
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2006-03-30       Impact factor: 2.279

7.  Left ventricular mass in dialysis patients, determinants and relation with outcome. Results from the COnvective TRansport STudy (CONTRAST).

Authors:  Ira M Mostovaya; Michiel L Bots; Marinus A van den Dorpel; Roel Goldschmeding; Claire H den Hoedt; Otto Kamp; Renée Levesque; Albert H A Mazairac; E Lars Penne; Dorine W Swinkels; Neelke C van der Weerd; Piet M Ter Wee; Menso J Nubé; Peter J Blankestijn; Muriel P C Grooteman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.