Alessandro Ghidini1, Carolyn M Salafia. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC 20007, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Rates of several obstetric complications have been reported to vary with fetal gender. We investigated whether a sex difference exists in findings at placental histology of extreme prematurity. DESIGN: Case-control study. SETTING: University Hospital. POPULATION: Four hundred and thirty-seven consecutive deliveries before 32 weeks of gestation of singleton, liveborn, non-anomalous infants. METHODS: Obstetric, neonatal and placental histologic findings were compared between male (n= 232) and female (n= 205) neonates. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Histologic evidence of acute placental inflammation, uteroplacental vascular pathology, intraplacental vascular pathology and chronic placental inflammation. RESULTS: Male fetuses had similar racial distributions, rate of nulliparity, maternal age, gestational age at delivery, placental weight and fetoplacental weight ratio as female fetuses, but higher birthweight centiles (41 [27] vs 33 [26]). Placental histology showed no association between fetal gender and lesions of acute inflammation (P= 0.08), intraplacental vascular pathology (P= 0.16) or uteroplacental vascular pathology (P= 0.83). However, lesions of chronic inflammation had a significantly higher score in male than in female fetuses (P= 0.001). When we examined the distribution of chronic placental inflammation, significantly more severe lesions were noted in male than in female fetuses at the implantation site (i.e. the area of interstitial trophoblast invasion of the maternal decidua and maternal endovascular trophoblast remodelling), than within the placental villi (chronic villitis) or in the amniochorionic membranes (where interstitial trophoblast invasion is minimal). CONCLUSION: In premature deliveries at <32 weeks, male fetal gender is associated with placental lesions suggestive of a maternal immune response against the invading interstitial trophoblast. The immunologic basis of these findings deserves further studies.
OBJECTIVE: Rates of several obstetric complications have been reported to vary with fetal gender. We investigated whether a sex difference exists in findings at placental histology of extreme prematurity. DESIGN: Case-control study. SETTING: University Hospital. POPULATION: Four hundred and thirty-seven consecutive deliveries before 32 weeks of gestation of singleton, liveborn, non-anomalous infants. METHODS: Obstetric, neonatal and placental histologic findings were compared between male (n= 232) and female (n= 205) neonates. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Histologic evidence of acute placental inflammation, uteroplacental vascular pathology, intraplacental vascular pathology and chronic placental inflammation. RESULTS: Male fetuses had similar racial distributions, rate of nulliparity, maternal age, gestational age at delivery, placental weight and fetoplacental weight ratio as female fetuses, but higher birthweight centiles (41 [27] vs 33 [26]). Placental histology showed no association between fetal gender and lesions of acute inflammation (P= 0.08), intraplacental vascular pathology (P= 0.16) or uteroplacental vascular pathology (P= 0.83). However, lesions of chronic inflammation had a significantly higher score in male than in female fetuses (P= 0.001). When we examined the distribution of chronic placental inflammation, significantly more severe lesions were noted in male than in female fetuses at the implantation site (i.e. the area of interstitial trophoblast invasion of the maternal decidua and maternal endovascular trophoblast remodelling), than within the placental villi (chronic villitis) or in the amniochorionic membranes (where interstitial trophoblast invasion is minimal). CONCLUSION: In premature deliveries at <32 weeks, male fetal gender is associated with placental lesions suggestive of a maternal immune response against the invading interstitial trophoblast. The immunologic basis of these findings deserves further studies.
Authors: Malin Cossi; Shkelqime Zuta; Amy M Padula; Jeffrey B Gould; David K Stevenson; Gary M Shaw Journal: Ann Epidemiol Date: 2015-08-29 Impact factor: 3.797
Authors: Wieslaw Jedrychowski; Frederica Perera; Dorota Mrozek-Budzyn; Elzbieta Mroz; Elzbieta Flak; Jack D Spengler; Susan Edwards; Ryszard Jacek; Irena Kaim; Zbigniew Skolicki Journal: Environ Res Date: 2009-03-03 Impact factor: 6.498
Authors: Kate Hoffman; Heather M Stapleton; Amelia Lorenzo; Craig M Butt; Linda Adair; Amy H Herring; Julie L Daniels Journal: Environ Int Date: 2018-04-24 Impact factor: 9.621
Authors: E Colicino; W Cowell; A Bozack; N Foppa Pedretti; A Joshi; M M Niedzwiecki; V Bollati; C Berin; R O Wright; R J Wright Journal: Environ Res Date: 2020-08-22 Impact factor: 6.498
Authors: Imran N Mir; Stormi P White; L Steven Brown; Roy Heyne; Charles R Rosenfeld; Lina F Chalak Journal: Pediatr Res Date: 2020-09-19 Impact factor: 3.756