Literature DB >> 15663274

Clinicopathological characteristics of patients with proximal third gastric carcinoma.

Dong Yi Kim1, Jae Kyoon Joo, Seong Yeob Ryu, Young Kyu Park, Young Jin Kim, Shin Kon Kim.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Epidemiological studies show a continuing rise in the prevalence of proximal third gastric carcinoma (PGC), and the prognosis of patients with this carcinoma is poorer than that of patients with more distally located gastric carcinomas. We compared the clinicopathological features and prognosis of PGC patients with those of patients with middle/distal gastric carcinoma (MGC/DGC).
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Of the 2696 patients diagnosed with gastric carcinoma who underwent surgery in our hospital in a 15-year period, 271 patients (10.1%) were diagnosed with PGC and retrospectively reviewed.
RESULTS: T1-category tumours were less common in patients with PGC than in patients with MGC/DGC (p < 0.001). Lymph node invasion was more common in patients with PGC than in patients with MGC/DGC (p < 0.05). Tumour stage (stage I) and T category (T1) significantly influenced the 5-year survival rates of patients whose tumours were resected with curative intent. The 5-year survival rate of patients whose PGC were resected with curative intent was higher than that of patients whose PGC were resected with palliative intent (57.4 vs. 12.6%, p < 0.001). The 5-year survival rate was 49.3% for patients with PGC and 57.3% for patients with MGC/DGC (p = 0.0273). Multivariate analysis showed that tumour size, lymph node status, and resection with curative intent were significant prognostic factors for survival in patients with PGC.
CONCLUSION: The poor prognosis of PGC is mainly due to its more advanced stage at diagnosis compared with that of more distally located gastric carcinoma. Early detection is important for improving the prognosis of patients with proximal third gastric carcinoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15663274     DOI: 10.1080/00015458.2004.11679642

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Chir Belg        ISSN: 0001-5458            Impact factor:   1.090


  6 in total

1.  Racial and Ethnic Variability in the Prevalence and Incidence of Comorbidities Associated with Gastric Cancer in the United States.

Authors:  Kimberly A Lowe; Mark D Danese; Michelle L Gleeson; Wendy J Langeberg; Juan Ke; Michael A Kelsh
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2016-06

2.  Prognosis of patients with gastric cancer who underwent proximal gastrectomy.

Authors:  Masahide Ikeguchi; Abdul Kader; Seigo Takaya; Youji Fukumoto; Tomohiro Osaki; Hiroaki Saito; Shigeru Tatebe; Toshiro Wakatsuki
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2012 Jul-Sep

3.  Clinicopathologic characteristics of early gastric cancer according to specific intragastric location.

Authors:  Kyungeun Kim; Younghye Cho; Jin Hee Sohn; Dong-Hoon Kim; In Gu Do; Hyun Joo Lee; Sung-Im Do; Sangjeong Ahn; Hyoun Wook Lee; Seoung Wan Chae
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-02-08       Impact factor: 3.067

4.  Clinico-pathologic determinants of non-e-curative outcome following en-bloc endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients with early gastric neoplasia.

Authors:  Kidane Siele Embaye; Chao Zhang; Matiwos Araya Ghebrehiwet; Zhihao Wang; Fengdi Zhang; Liwei Liu; Shenghui Qin; Lingzhi Qin; Jun Wang; Xi Wang
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 4.430

5.  Stage-stratified analysis of prognostic significance of tumor size in patients with gastric cancer.

Authors:  Hongliang Zu; Feng Wang; Yan Ma; Yingwei Xue
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Comparison of clinicopathologic profiles and prognosis of gastric cancer in the upper, middle and lower third of the stomach: A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Xiaoming Ma; Chengwu Zhang; Cheng Wang; Wei Miao; Wei Zhou; Juan An; Wenjie Qiao; Mingzheng Li; Minggui Lai; Pengjie Yu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 1.817

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.