Literature DB >> 15663134

Gestational trophoblastic disease: is intensive follow up essential in all women?

Narendra Pisal1, John Tidy, Barry Hancock.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the timescale of the registration process for gestational trophoblastic disease and its impact on hCG level at registration and subsequent need for chemotherapy.
DESIGN: A prospective observational study using a standardised protocol for registration, assessment and treatment for molar pregnancy.
SETTING: A supra-regional tertiary referral centre for gestational trophoblastic disease. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 2046 consecutive women registered between January 1994 and December 1998 with a diagnosis of molar pregnancy.
METHODS: Data at and after registration, collected prospectively on a computerised database, were statistically analysed (by multiple logistic regression and ANOVA). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Relationship between length of time to and hCG value at registration; also the subsequent need for chemotherapy.
RESULTS: A total of 2046 women with a diagnosis of molar pregnancy were registered in the study period. The mean time interval between first evacuation and registration at the referral centre was 47 days (median 37, range 0-594). One hundred and five out of 2046 (5.1%) women needed chemotherapy. Sixty-three precent of the women (1296 out of 2046) had a normal level of urinary hCG (less than 40 IU/24 hours) at the time of registration and only one (0.08%) needed chemotherapy. Binary logistic regression analysis showed a statistically significant relationship between time to registration, hCG value, histology, pretreatment risk score and decision to administer chemotherapy.
CONCLUSION: Women with gestational trophoblastic disease who were registered late were significantly more likely to have normal levels of hCG and were less likely to need chemotherapy. A less intensive follow up may be justified in women with gestational trophoblastic disease who are registered with a normal hCG level.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15663134     DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00339.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJOG        ISSN: 1470-0328            Impact factor:   6.531


  3 in total

1.  Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia: Experience from a Tertiary Care Center of India.

Authors:  Ansar Hussain; Sheikh Aejaz Aziz; Gul Mohd Bhatt; A R Lone; Hk Imran Hussain; Burhan Wani; Nadeem Qazi
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2015-06-11

2.  A profile of cases of gestational trophoblastic neoplasia at a large tertiary centre in dubai.

Authors:  Tasneem H Rangwala; Faiza Badawi
Journal:  ISRN Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-07-26

3.  Gestational trophoblastic neoplasia, management as per risk stratification in a developing country.

Authors:  Ansar Hussain; Aejaz Aziz Shiekh; Gul Mohd Bhat; A R Lone
Journal:  Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.