Literature DB >> 15662497

The establishment of endovascular aneurysm coiling at a neurovascular unit: report of experience during early years.

O Norbäck1, G Gál, M Johansson, S Solander, M Tovi, L Persson, E Ronne-Engström, P Enblad.   

Abstract

The treatment of cerebral aneurysms is changing from surgical clipping to endovascular coiling (EVC) in many neurovascular centres. The aim of this study was to evaluate the technical results and clinical outcome at 6 months in a consecutive series of subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) patients treated with EVC, in a situation when the EVC had been established very rapidly as the first line of treatment at a neurovascular centre. The patient material comprised 239 SAH patients (155 women and 84 men, mean age 55 years, age range 16-81) allocated to EVC as the first line of treatment in the acute stage (within 3 weeks of rupture) between September 1996 and December 2000. Clinical grade on admission was Hunt & Hess (H&H) I and II in 42%, H&H III in 25% and H&H grade IV and V in 33% of the patients. The aneurysm was located in the anterior circulation in 82% of the cases. EVC was performed on days 0-3 in 77% of the cases. EVC of the target aneurysm was able to be completed in 222 patients (93%). Complete occlusion was achieved in 126 patients (53%). Procedural complications occurred in 39 patients (16%). Favourable clinical outcome was observed in 57%, severe disability in 28% and poor outcome in 14% of the patients. Favourable outcome was achieved in 77% of H&H I and II patients and in 43% of H&H III-V patients. The multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that younger age, good neurological grade on admission, absence of intracerebral hematoma and intraventricular hematoma respectively, ICA-PcomA aneurysm location, later treatment and absence of complications were significant predictors of favourable outcome. After interventional training and installation of the X-ray system, the introduction and establishment of EVC at a neurovascular unit can be done in a short period of time and with favourable results. Future studies must concentrate on identifying factors of importance for the choice of interventional or surgical therapy. The results of this study indicate that endovascular therapy may be particularly beneficial in poor-grade patients and in patients with aneurysms in the ICA-PcomA territory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15662497     DOI: 10.1007/s00234-004-1300-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroradiology        ISSN: 0028-3940            Impact factor:   2.804


  22 in total

1.  Prospective analysis of aneurysm treatment in a series of 103 consecutive patients when endovascular embolization is considered the first option.

Authors:  C Raftopoulos; P Mathurin; D Boscherini; R F Billa; M Van Boven; P Hantson
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 5.115

Review 2.  Analyzing outcome of treatment of severe head injury: a review and update on advancing the use of the Glasgow Outcome Scale.

Authors:  G M Teasdale; L E Pettigrew; J T Wilson; G Murray; B Jennett
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 5.269

Review 3.  Treatment of intracranial aneurysms by embolization with coils: a systematic review.

Authors:  E H Brilstra; G J Rinkel; Y van der Graaf; W J van Rooij; A Algra
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 7.914

4.  Surgical risk as related to time of intervention in the repair of intracranial aneurysms.

Authors:  W E Hunt; R M Hess
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1968-01       Impact factor: 5.115

5.  Electrothrombosis of saccular aneurysms via endovascular approach. Part 2: Preliminary clinical experience.

Authors:  G Guglielmi; F Viñuela; J Dion; G Duckwiler
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 5.115

6.  Combined management of intracranial aneurysms by surgical and endovascular treatment. Modalities and results from a series of 395 cases.

Authors:  G Lot; E Houdart; J Cophignon; A Casasco; B George
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.216

7.  Introduction of GDC embolization in the clinical practice as treatment synergical to surgery: impact on overall outcome of patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Authors:  P P Versari; M Cenzato; F Tartara; C Righi; F Simionato; E Sganzerla; R Marina; S M Gaini; G Scotti; M Giovanelli
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.216

8.  Effects of timing of coil embolization after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage on procedural morbidity and outcomes.

Authors:  G S Baltsavias; J V Byrne; J Halsey; S C Coley; M J Sohn; A J Molyneux
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.654

9.  Clinical and angiographic outcomes, with treatment data, for patients with cerebral aneurysms treated with Guglielmi detachable coils: a single-center experience.

Authors:  T A Kuether; G M Nesbit; S L Barnwell
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 4.654

10.  Guglielmi detachable coil embolization of cerebral aneurysms: 11 years' experience.

Authors:  Yuichi Murayama; Yih Lin Nien; Gary Duckwiler; Y Pierre Gobin; Reza Jahan; John Frazee; Neil Martin; Fernando Viñuela
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.115

View more
  1 in total

1.  Periprocedural morbidity and mortality by endovascular treatment of cerebral aneurysms with GDC: a retrospective 12-year experience of a single center.

Authors:  G B Bradac; M Bergui; G Stura; M Fontanella; D Daniele; L Gozzoli; M Berardino; A Ducati
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2007-01-11       Impact factor: 3.042

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.