INTRODUCTION: Respect of guidelines for peripheral venous placement has never been studied in prehospital setting. OBJECTIVE: Describe prehospital practice in peripheral venous placement and perform comparison with guidelines. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prospective study, in mobile intensive care unit from a university hospital, October 2002 to January 2003. Study of prehospital practice for peripheral venous placement in prehospital setting and comparison with guidelines. Guideline from Anaes: wearing a cap and a mask, washing hands, washing insertion site with water and soap, wearing sterile gloves, using sterile gauze, applying iodine solution to the insertion site, using catheter with a protective system and applying occlusive dressing. RESULTS: Six hundred seventy-three reports were studied. A cap and a mask wearing and washing insertion site with water and soap were never respected. Washing hand with antiseptic was reported in 56% of the cases, washing insertion site with iodine solution in 4%, wearing sterile gloves in 21%, using catheter with a protective system in 89%, using sterile gauze in 1% and applying occlusive dressing in 99%. For each criterion, respect of guidelines was significantly more frequent in nurse practice than in physician practice. CONCLUSION: Guidelines for peripheral venous placement were not respected in prehospital setting. Education and formation are necessary to optimize infectious risk prevention in prehospital care.
INTRODUCTION: Respect of guidelines for peripheral venous placement has never been studied in prehospital setting. OBJECTIVE: Describe prehospital practice in peripheral venous placement and perform comparison with guidelines. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prospective study, in mobile intensive care unit from a university hospital, October 2002 to January 2003. Study of prehospital practice for peripheral venous placement in prehospital setting and comparison with guidelines. Guideline from Anaes: wearing a cap and a mask, washing hands, washing insertion site with water and soap, wearing sterile gloves, using sterile gauze, applying iodine solution to the insertion site, using catheter with a protective system and applying occlusive dressing. RESULTS: Six hundred seventy-three reports were studied. A cap and a mask wearing and washing insertion site with water and soap were never respected. Washing hand with antiseptic was reported in 56% of the cases, washing insertion site with iodine solution in 4%, wearing sterile gloves in 21%, using catheter with a protective system in 89%, using sterile gauze in 1% and applying occlusive dressing in 99%. For each criterion, respect of guidelines was significantly more frequent in nurse practice than in physician practice. CONCLUSION: Guidelines for peripheral venous placement were not respected in prehospital setting. Education and formation are necessary to optimize infectious risk prevention in prehospital care.