Literature DB >> 15661288

Comparison of differences between copper bioaccumulation and biosorption.

Jana Kaduková1, Edita Vircíková.   

Abstract

Biological methods for wastewater treatment are becoming more accepted all over the world. The method, which makes use of accumulating abilities of living cells, is called bioaccumulation. In contrast with it, biosorption takes advantage of sequestering capabilities of dry or dead cells, which is technologically advantageous. The differences between bioaccumulation and biosorption of copper from model solutions were studied in this work. Application of living algal cells has some disadvantages. Copper significantly damages the surface of living cells, which results in partial loss of cell-binding abilities and release of accumulated copper back into solution. The binding capacity of living cells is significantly lower than that of dead cells. There is also a possibility of desorption and reuse of biomass in case of biosorption.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15661288     DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2004.09.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Int        ISSN: 0160-4120            Impact factor:   9.621


  13 in total

1.  Multiple copper adsorption and regeneration by zeolite 4A synthesized from bauxite tailings.

Authors:  Xianjiang Shen; Guibo Qiu; Changsheng Yue; Min Guo; Mei Zhang
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 2.  A comparative review towards potential of microbial cells for heavy metal removal with emphasis on biosorption and bioaccumulation.

Authors:  Arti Hansda; Vipin Kumar
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 3.312

Review 3.  Metal-tolerant thermophiles: metals as electron donors and acceptors, toxicity, tolerance and industrial applications.

Authors:  Preeti Ranawat; Seema Rawat
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Chromium (VI) biosorption by Saccharomyces cerevisiae subjected to chemical and thermal treatments.

Authors:  Andrea De Rossi; Magali Rejane Rigon; Munise Zaparoli; Rafael Dalmas Braido; Luciane Maria Colla; Guilherme Luiz Dotto; Jeferson Steffanello Piccin
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-05-28       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Characterization of cadmium biosorption by Exiguobacterium sp. isolated from farmland soil near Cu-Pb-Zn mine.

Authors:  Jin Hee Park; Hyo-Taek Chon
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Biomass of Spirulina maxima enriched by biosorption process as a new feed supplement for swine.

Authors:  A Saeid; K Chojnacka; M Korczyński; D Korniewicz; Z Dobrzański
Journal:  J Appl Phycol       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 3.215

7.  Response to excess copper in the hyperthermophile Sulfolobus solfataricus strain 98/2.

Authors:  Aramis A Villafane; Yekaterina Voskoboynik; Mariola Cuebas; Ilona Ruhl; Elisabetta Bini
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2009-05-08       Impact factor: 3.575

8.  Biosorption of heavy metals by Bacillus thuringiensis strain OSM29 originating from industrial effluent contaminated north Indian soil.

Authors:  Mohammad Oves; Mohammad Saghir Khan; Almas Zaidi
Journal:  Saudi J Biol Sci       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 4.219

9.  Effect on supplementation of Spirulina maxima enriched with Cu on production performance, metabolical and physiological parameters in fattening pigs.

Authors:  A Saeid; K Chojnacka; M Korczyński; D Korniewicz; Z Dobrzański
Journal:  J Appl Phycol       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 3.215

10.  Biofilm Formation, Production of Matrix Compounds and Biosorption of Copper, Nickel and Lead by Different Bacterial Strains.

Authors:  Md Manjurul Haque; Md Khaled Mosharaf; Md Amdadul Haque; Md Zahid Hasan Tanvir; Md Khairul Alam
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 5.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.