OBJECTIVE: To report our experience about the role of sentinel node biopsy in cervical cancer patients while debating provocatory arguments concerning this procedure. METHODS: From June 2001 to February 2003, patients affected by stage IB(1) cervical cancer were submitted to the sentinel node biopsy procedure. Patients were submitted to lymphoscintigraphy and, subsequently, to laparoscopy in order to locate the sentinel lymph node. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients were enrolled in the study. Sentinel node(s) was(were) identified with preoperative lymphoscintigraphy in 89% of the patients. Intraoperative detection rate was 70%. During surgery in 31% of the patients, sentinel node was detected bilaterally; in 15%, two sentinel nodes on the same side of the lymphatic vessels were detected. The sentinel node was located at the level of superficial common iliac vessels (26%), external iliac vessels (69%), and superficial obturator vessels (49%). In 77% of the patients, the histologic specimen sent by the surgeon as unique sentinel node contained two or more nodes. Metastatic sentinel nodes were found in 23% of the patients. There was no case with a positive nonsentinel node in the presence of a negative sentinel node. CONCLUSION: Sentinel node detection is a feasible procedure in cervical cancer patients. However, a high percentage of patients is found with bilateral and/or more than one sentinel lymph node. Improvements in detection rate and pathological analysis are needed prior to consider the sentinel node biopsy a routine procedure in cervical cancer patients.
OBJECTIVE: To report our experience about the role of sentinel node biopsy in cervical cancerpatients while debating provocatory arguments concerning this procedure. METHODS: From June 2001 to February 2003, patients affected by stage IB(1) cervical cancer were submitted to the sentinel node biopsy procedure. Patients were submitted to lymphoscintigraphy and, subsequently, to laparoscopy in order to locate the sentinel lymph node. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients were enrolled in the study. Sentinel node(s) was(were) identified with preoperative lymphoscintigraphy in 89% of the patients. Intraoperative detection rate was 70%. During surgery in 31% of the patients, sentinel node was detected bilaterally; in 15%, two sentinel nodes on the same side of the lymphatic vessels were detected. The sentinel node was located at the level of superficial common iliac vessels (26%), external iliac vessels (69%), and superficial obturator vessels (49%). In 77% of the patients, the histologic specimen sent by the surgeon as unique sentinel node contained two or more nodes. Metastatic sentinel nodes were found in 23% of the patients. There was no case with a positive nonsentinel node in the presence of a negative sentinel node. CONCLUSION: Sentinel node detection is a feasible procedure in cervical cancerpatients. However, a high percentage of patients is found with bilateral and/or more than one sentinel lymph node. Improvements in detection rate and pathological analysis are needed prior to consider the sentinel node biopsy a routine procedure in cervical cancerpatients.
Authors: I Roca; A P Caresia; A Gil-Moreno; P Pifarre; S Aguade-Bruix; J Castell-Conesa; J M Martínez-Palones; J Xercavins Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2005-05-21 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Stephen P Povoski; Ryan L Neff; Cathy M Mojzisik; David M O'Malley; George H Hinkle; Nathan C Hall; Douglas A Murrey; Michael V Knopp; Edward W Martin Journal: World J Surg Oncol Date: 2009-01-27 Impact factor: 2.754