Literature DB >> 15660952

Brood size modifications affect plumage bacterial assemblages of European starlings.

Françoise S Lucas1, Benoit Moureau, Violaine Jourdie, Philipp Heeb.   

Abstract

During reproduction, birds face trade-offs between time and energy devoted to parental effort and traits associated with self-maintenance. We manipulated brood sizes to investigate the effects of such trade-offs on feather bacterial densities and the structure of bacterial assemblages on feathers in adult European starlings, Sturnus vulgaris, and in vitro feather degradation. As predicted by a trade-off between parental effort and self-maintenance, we found that birds with enlarged broods had more free-living bacteria on their feathers than birds with reduced broods. Furthermore, we found a significant interaction between brood manipulation and original brood size on free-living bacterial densities suggesting that the trade-off is mediated by the adults' initial reproductive investment. In contrast, brood size manipulations had no significant effect on densities of attached bacteria. Using ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis (RISA), we demonstrated that brood manipulations significantly modified the structure (band pattern) of feather-degrading bacterial assemblages, but had no significant effect on their richness (number of bands) or the in vitro feather degradation. In vitro feather degradation varied in relation to the premanipulation brood size and positively with the richness of the feather degrading bacterial community. Besides brood manipulation effect, we found that ecological factors and individual traits, such as the age, the nest location or the capture date, shaped bacterial assemblages and feather degradation capacities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15660952     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02436.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol        ISSN: 0962-1083            Impact factor:   6.185


  10 in total

1.  Microorganisms associated with feathers of barn swallows in radioactively contaminated areas around chernobyl.

Authors:  Gábor Arpád Czirják; Anders Pape Møller; Timothy A Mousseau; Philipp Heeb
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2010-07-17       Impact factor: 4.552

2.  Variation in plumage microbiota depends on season and migration.

Authors:  Isabelle-A Bisson; Peter P Marra; Edward H Burtt; Masoumeh Sikaroodi; Patrick M Gillevet
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2009-02-11       Impact factor: 4.552

3.  Experimental study of the effect of preen oil against feather bacteria in passerine birds.

Authors:  Grete Alt; Marko Mägi; Jaanis Lodjak; Raivo Mänd
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Manipulation of parental effort affects plumage bacterial load in a wild passerine.

Authors:  Grete Alt; Pauli Saag; Marko Mägi; Veljo Kisand; Raivo Mänd
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2015-02-07       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Effects of access to preen gland secretions on mallard plumage.

Authors:  Mathieu Giraudeau; Camille Duval; Noel Guillon; Vincent Bretagnolle; Claude Gutierrez; Philipp Heeb
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2010-05-02

6.  Plumage bacterial assemblages in a breeding wild passerine: relationships with ecological factors and body condition.

Authors:  Pauli Saag; Vallo Tilgar; Raivo Mänd; Priit Kilgas; Marko Mägi
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2011-01-15       Impact factor: 4.552

7.  A molecular comparison of plumage and soil bacteria across biogeographic, ecological, and taxonomic scales.

Authors:  Isabelle-Anne Bisson; Peter P Marra; Edward H Burtt; Masoumeh Sikaroodi; Patrick M Gillevet
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2007-03-02       Impact factor: 4.552

8.  Do feather-degrading bacteria actually degrade feather colour? No significant effects of plumage microbiome modifications on feather colouration in wild great tits.

Authors:  Staffan Jacob; Léa Colmas; Nathalie Parthuisot; Philipp Heeb
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2014-09-17

Review 9.  The skin microbiome of vertebrates.

Authors:  Ashley A Ross; Aline Rodrigues Hoffmann; Josh D Neufeld
Journal:  Microbiome       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 14.650

10.  Uropygial gland size and composition varies according to experimentally modified microbiome in Great tits.

Authors:  Staffan Jacob; Anika Immer; Sarah Leclaire; Nathalie Parthuisot; Christine Ducamp; Gilles Espinasse; Philipp Heeb
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 3.260

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.