Literature DB >> 15660612

Examining localized patterns of air quality perception in Texas: a spatial and statistical analysis.

Samuel D Brody1, B Mitchell Peck, Wesley E Highfield.   

Abstract

Environmental and human health issues associated with outdoor air pollution, such as ozone, sulfur dioxide, and other pollutants in metropolitan regions, are an area of growing concern for both policy officials and the general public. Increasing attention from the news media, new health data, and public debate over the effectiveness of clean air regulations have raised the importance of air quality in the public consciousness. While public perceptions of air quality have been studied thoroughly dating back to the 1960s, little empirical research has been conducted to explain the spatial aspects of these perceptions, particularly at the local level. Although recent studies suggest characteristics of local setting are important in shaping perceptions of air quality, the roles of proximity, neighborhood characteristics, and location have not been clarified. This study seeks to improve understanding of the major factors shaping public perceptions of air quality by examining the spatial pattern of local risk perception, the role of socioeconomic characteristics in forming these perceptions, and the relationship between perceived and scientifically measured air pollution. First, we map the spatial pattern of local air quality perceptions using Geographic Information Systems (GIS) across the Dallas and Houston metropolitan areas. Next, we explain these perceptions through local contextual factors using both bivariate correlations and multivariate regression analysis. Results indicate that perceptions of air quality in the study areas are not significantly correlated with air quality based on readings of air monitoring stations. Instead, perceptions appear to be influenced by setting (urban vs. rural), state identification, access to information, and socioeconomic characteristics such as age, race, and political identification. We discuss the implications of the findings and provide direction on how further research can provide a deeper understanding of the local contextual factors influencing public perceptions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15660612     DOI: 10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00550.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Risk Anal        ISSN: 0272-4332            Impact factor:   4.000


  25 in total

1.  Community perception of water quality in a mining-affected area: a case study for the Certej catchment in the Apuseni Mountains in Romania.

Authors:  Diana Dogaru; Jürg Zobrist; Dan Balteanu; Claudia Popescu; Mihaela Sima; Manouchehr Amini; Hong Yang
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2009-01-29       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Concern about petrochemical health risk before and after a refinery explosion.

Authors:  Malcolm P Cutchin; Kathryn Remmes Martin; Steven V Owen; James S Goodwin
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 4.000

3.  Comparative Optimism: Relative Risk Perception and Behavioral Response to Lead Exposure.

Authors:  Bernabas Wolde; Pankaj Lal; Melissa Harclerode; Alessandra Rossi
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2019-03-14       Impact factor: 3.266

4.  The influence of uncertain map features on risk beliefs and perceived ambiguity for maps of modeled cancer risk from air pollution.

Authors:  Dolores J Severtson; Jeffrey D Myers
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2012-09-17       Impact factor: 4.000

5.  Testing Map Features Designed to Convey the Uncertainty of Cancer Risk: Insights Gained From Assessing Judgments of Information Adequacy and Communication Goals.

Authors:  Dolores J Severtson
Journal:  Sci Commun       Date:  2015-02

6.  Perceived air quality and particulate matter pollution based on field survey data during a winter period.

Authors:  Katerina Pantavou; Basil Psiloglou; Spyridon Lykoudis; Anastasios Mavrakis; Georgios K Nikolopoulos
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2018-10-26       Impact factor: 3.787

7.  Perceiving the environment from the lay perspective in desertified areas, northern China.

Authors:  Harry F Lee; David D Zhang
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.644

8.  Community perceptions of air pollution and related health risks in Nairobi slums.

Authors:  Thaddaeus Egondi; Catherine Kyobutungi; Nawi Ng; Kanyiva Muindi; Samuel Oti; Steven van de Vijver; Remare Ettarh; Joacim Rocklöv
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  "We are used to this": a qualitative assessment of the perceptions of and attitudes towards air pollution amongst slum residents in Nairobi.

Authors:  Kanyiva Muindi; Thaddaeus Egondi; Elizabeth Kimani-Murage; Joacim Rocklov; Nawi Ng
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Geospatial interpolation and mapping of tropospheric ozone pollution using geostatistics.

Authors:  Swatantra R Kethireddy; Paul B Tchounwou; Hafiz A Ahmad; Anjaneyulu Yerramilli; John H Young
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2014-01-10       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.