Literature DB >> 15660607

Toward improved communication about wildland fire: mental models research to identify information needs for natural resource management.

Melissa Zaksek1, Joseph L Arvai.   

Abstract

The management of natural- and human-induced wildland fires is an intricate process that must balance two considerations: that of fire as a necessary natural disturbance and that of the risks that fire poses. Reconciling tradeoffs between these risks and benefits is contingent upon informed, directed, and two-way communication between wildland fire managers and stakeholders. In an effort to aid with the design of such a communication effort, this study used mental models research to determine the unique wildland fire information and decision-making needs of stakeholders living at the wildland-urban interface of a fire-prone area. While the analysis revealed many similarities in how stakeholders conceptualized the risks and benefits of wildland fire, many misconceptions and important gaps in understanding on the part of both expert and nonexpert respondents were identified.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15660607     DOI: 10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00545.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Risk Anal        ISSN: 0272-4332            Impact factor:   4.000


  8 in total

1.  Stakeholder understandings of wildfire mitigation: a case of shared and contested meanings.

Authors:  Joseph G Champ; Jeffrey J Brooks; Daniel R Williams
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2012-08-11       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Understanding the Factors that Influence Perceptions of Post-Wildfire Landscape Recovery Across 25 Wildfires in the Northwestern United States.

Authors:  C Kooistra; T E Hall; T Paveglio; M Pickering
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2017-11-25       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  Applying Mental Model Methods to Characterize Understanding of Gene-Environment Influences: The Case of Podoconiosis in Ethiopia.

Authors:  Caitlin G Allen; Colleen M McBride; Kibur Engdawork; Desta Ayode; Getnet Tadele
Journal:  Crit Public Health       Date:  2017-12-06

4.  Applying the common sense model to measure representations of arsenic contaminated well water.

Authors:  Dolores J Severtson; Linda C Baumann; Roger L Brown
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2008-09

5.  The Pesticide Risk Beliefs Inventory: a quantitative instrument for the assessment of beliefs about pesticide risks.

Authors:  Catherine E LePrevost; Margaret R Blanchard; W Gregory Cope
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  A qualitative study of the knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors of people exposed to diesel exhaust at the workplace in British Columbia, Canada.

Authors:  Mandy Pui; Anne-Marie Nicol; Michael Brauer; Farshad Palad; Christopher Carlsten
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-25       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Public Perceptions of Contentious Risk: The Case of Rubber Granulate in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Marion de Vries; Liesbeth Claassen; Marcel Mennen; Aura Timen; Margreet J M Te Wierik; Danielle R M Timmermans
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-06-25       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Meningococcal W135 Disease Vaccination Intent, the Netherlands, 2018-2019.

Authors:  Marion de Vries; Liesbeth Claassen; Margreet J M Te Wierik; Feray Coban; Albert Wong; Danielle R M Timmermans; Aura Timen
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 6.883

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.