Literature DB >> 15660604

Application of human reliability analysis to nursing errors in hospitals.

Kayoko Inoue1, Akio Koizumi.   

Abstract

Adverse events in hospitals, such as in surgery, anesthesia, radiology, intensive care, internal medicine, and pharmacy, are of worldwide concern and it is important, therefore, to learn from such incidents. There are currently no appropriate tools based on state-of-the art models available for the analysis of large bodies of medical incident reports. In this study, a new model was developed to facilitate medical error analysis in combination with quantitative risk assessment. This model enables detection of the organizational factors that underlie medical errors, and the expedition of decision making in terms of necessary action. Furthermore, it determines medical tasks as module practices and uses a unique coding system to describe incidents. This coding system has seven vectors for error classification: patient category, working shift, module practice, linkage chain (error type, direct threat, and indirect threat), medication, severity, and potential hazard. Such mathematical formulation permitted us to derive two parameters: error rates for module practices and weights for the aforementioned seven elements. The error rate of each module practice was calculated by dividing the annual number of incident reports of each module practice by the annual number of the corresponding module practice. The weight of a given element was calculated by the summation of incident report error rates for an element of interest. This model was applied specifically to nursing practices in six hospitals over a year; 5,339 incident reports with a total of 63,294,144 module practices conducted were analyzed. Quality assurance (QA) of our model was introduced by checking the records of quantities of practices and reproducibility of analysis of medical incident reports. For both items, QA guaranteed legitimacy of our model. Error rates for all module practices were approximately of the order 10(-4) in all hospitals. Three major organizational factors were found to underlie medical errors: "violation of rules" with a weight of 826 x 10(-4), "failure of labor management" with a weight of 661 x 10(-4), and "defects in the standardization of nursing practices" with a weight of 495 x 10(-4).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15660604     DOI: 10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00542.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Risk Anal        ISSN: 0272-4332            Impact factor:   4.000


  4 in total

1.  A cross sectional research on the height, weight and body mass index of children aged 5-6 years in Latvia and its secular changes during the last century.

Authors:  Helena Karkliņa; Dzanna Krumina; Inguna Ebela; Janis Valeinis; Gundega Knipse
Journal:  Cent Eur J Public Health       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 1.163

2.  Nursing-related patient safety events in hospitals.

Authors:  Yilan Liu; Guanghong Zhao; Fen Li; Xingzhi Huang; Deying Hu; Juan Xu; Shanglong Yao; Liang Zhang
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2009-04-28

Review 3.  Development of an evidence-based framework of factors contributing to patient safety incidents in hospital settings: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rebecca Lawton; Rosemary R C McEachan; Sally J Giles; Reema Sirriyeh; Ian S Watt; John Wright
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 7.035

4.  Quantifying the impact of environment factors on the risk of medical responders' stress-related absenteeism.

Authors:  Mario P Brito; Zhiyin Chen; James Wise; Simon Mortimore
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 4.302

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.