BACKGROUND: Surgery for thoracic esophageal cancer after gastrectomy involves a complicated reconstruction procedure. A surgeon's hesitation is further increased because the clinical outcome of surgical treatment of these patients has not been elucidated. OBJECTIVES: Among 948 thoracic esophageal cancer patients who underwent curative operation, 72 (7.6%) had a history of gastrectomy. Their clinico-pathological features and survival (follow-up average 881 days) were compared with those without gastrectomy. RESULTS: Esophagectomy for patients after gastrectomy was performed via right thoracotomy (66), left thoracotomy (4), and transhiatal resection (2), and reconstruction was done using the right-side colon (57) or jejunum (15). Compared to non-gastrectomized patients, gastrectomized patients were exposed to longer operation time (523 min vs. 460 min), but no significant difference was observed in operative mortality (4.2% vs. 2.5%) or blood loss (1,189 ml vs. 990 ml). Pathological examination showed no significant difference in depth of tumor invasion, lymph node metastasis, and TNM staging between gastrectomized and non-gastrectomized patients, while tumors were located at lower position in the gastrectomized patients (P = 0.046). The overall and cause-specific 5-year survival rates were 56% and 65% for gastrectomized esophageal cancer patients, which were significantly better than for non-gastrectomized patients (36% and 44%, P = 0.0235 and 0.024, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed gastrectomy as a marginally independent factor for a favorable prognosis (hazard ratio 1.832, P = 0.0324). With respect to tumor recurrence, hematogenic metastasis tended to be less frequent in gastrectomized patients than in non-gastrectomized patients. In gastrectomized patients, neither disease (peptic ulcer or gastric cancer) nor reconstruction (Billroth-I, Billroth-II, and Roux-Y) for gastrectomy affected the clinicopathological findings or post-operable survival. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical treatment of esophageal cancer patients after gastrectomy was complicated but tolerable, and should be considered as a reliable therapeutic modality because of favorable patient prognosis. (c) 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
BACKGROUND: Surgery for thoracic esophageal cancer after gastrectomy involves a complicated reconstruction procedure. A surgeon's hesitation is further increased because the clinical outcome of surgical treatment of these patients has not been elucidated. OBJECTIVES: Among 948 thoracic esophageal cancerpatients who underwent curative operation, 72 (7.6%) had a history of gastrectomy. Their clinico-pathological features and survival (follow-up average 881 days) were compared with those without gastrectomy. RESULTS: Esophagectomy for patients after gastrectomy was performed via right thoracotomy (66), left thoracotomy (4), and transhiatal resection (2), and reconstruction was done using the right-side colon (57) or jejunum (15). Compared to non-gastrectomized patients, gastrectomized patients were exposed to longer operation time (523 min vs. 460 min), but no significant difference was observed in operative mortality (4.2% vs. 2.5%) or blood loss (1,189 ml vs. 990 ml). Pathological examination showed no significant difference in depth of tumor invasion, lymph node metastasis, and TNM staging between gastrectomized and non-gastrectomized patients, while tumors were located at lower position in the gastrectomized patients (P = 0.046). The overall and cause-specific 5-year survival rates were 56% and 65% for gastrectomized esophageal cancerpatients, which were significantly better than for non-gastrectomized patients (36% and 44%, P = 0.0235 and 0.024, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed gastrectomy as a marginally independent factor for a favorable prognosis (hazard ratio 1.832, P = 0.0324). With respect to tumor recurrence, hematogenic metastasis tended to be less frequent in gastrectomized patients than in non-gastrectomized patients. In gastrectomized patients, neither disease (peptic ulcer or gastric cancer) nor reconstruction (Billroth-I, Billroth-II, and Roux-Y) for gastrectomy affected the clinicopathological findings or post-operable survival. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical treatment of esophageal cancerpatients after gastrectomy was complicated but tolerable, and should be considered as a reliable therapeutic modality because of favorable patient prognosis. (c) 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.