Literature DB >> 15660263

Genetic testing for maturity onset diabetes of the young: uptake, attitudes and comparison with hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer.

B Liljeström1, K Aktan-Collan, B Isomaa, L Sarelin, A Uutela, L Groop, H Kääriäinen, T Tuomi.   

Abstract

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Mutations in hepatic nuclear factor 1alpha cause a monogenic form of diabetes, maturity onset diabetes of the young type 3 (MODY3). Our aim was (1) to assess the uptake of genetic testing for MODY3 and to determine factors affecting it, and (2) to compare attitudes to predictive genetic testing between families with MODY3 and a previously studied group at risk of hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC).
METHODS: Adult members of two extended MODY3 pedigrees, either with diabetes or a 50% risk of having inherited the mutation (n=144, age 18-60 years), were invited to an educational counselling session followed by a possibility to obtain the gene test result. Data were collected through questionnaires before counselling and 1 month after the test disclosure.
RESULTS: Eighty-nine out of 144 (62%) participated in counselling, and all but one wanted the test result disclosed. No significant sociodemographic differences were observed between the participants and non-participants. The counselling uptake was similar among diabetic and non-diabetic subjects. Uncertainty about the future and the risk for the children were the most common reasons to take the gene test. At follow-up, most subjects in both MODY3 (100%) and HNPCC (99%) families were satisfied with their decision to take the test and trusted the result. The majority of both diabetic and non-diabetic subjects considered that the MODY3 gene test should be offered either in childhood (50 and 37%) or as a teenager (30 and 37%).
CONCLUSIONS: Genetic testing for MODY3 was well accepted among both diabetic and non-diabetic participants. The subjects found the gene test reliable and they were satisfied with their decision regarding the predictive test.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15660263     DOI: 10.1007/s00125-004-1629-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetologia        ISSN: 0012-186X            Impact factor:   10.122


  30 in total

1.  Predictive genetic testing for hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer: uptake and long-term satisfaction.

Authors:  K Aktan-Collan; J P Mecklin; H Järvinen; M Nyström-Lahti; P Peltomäki; I Söderling; A Uutela; A de la Chapelle; H Kääriäinen
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2000-01-20       Impact factor: 7.396

Review 2.  Mutations predisposing to hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer.

Authors:  P Peltomäki; A de la Chapelle
Journal:  Adv Cancer Res       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 6.242

3.  Insulin secretion and insulin sensitivity in diabetic subgroups: studies in the prediabetic and diabetic state.

Authors:  D Tripathy; A L Carlsson; M Lehto; B Isomaa; T Tuomi; L Groop
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 10.122

4.  Mutations in NEUROD1 are associated with the development of type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  M T Malecki; U S Jhala; A Antonellis; L Fields; A Doria; T Orban; M Saad; J H Warram; M Montminy; A S Krolewski
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 38.330

5.  Feasibility of genetic and immunological prediction of type I diabetes in a population-based birth cohort.

Authors:  A Kupila; P Muona; T Simell; P Arvilommi; H Savolainen; A M Hämäläinen; S Korhonen; T Kimpimäki; M Sjöroos; J Ilonen; M Knip; O Simell
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 10.122

Review 6.  Genetics, natural history, tumor spectrum, and pathology of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer: an updated review.

Authors:  H T Lynch; T C Smyrk; P Watson; S J Lanspa; J F Lynch; P M Lynch; R J Cavalieri; C R Boland
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 22.682

7.  On attitudes and appreciation 6 months after predictive DNA testing for Huntington disease in the Dutch program.

Authors:  A Tibben; P G Frets; J J van de Kamp; M F Niermeijer; M Vegtervan der Vlis; R A Roos; H G Rooymans; G J van Ommen; F Verhage
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  1993-07-15

8.  Genetic cause of hyperglycaemia and response to treatment in diabetes.

Authors:  Ewan R Pearson; Bryan J Starkey; Roy J Powell; Fiona M Gribble; Penny M Clark; Andrew T Hattersley
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-10-18       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Predictive testing for Huntington disease in Canada: adverse effects and unexpected results in those receiving a decreased risk.

Authors:  M Huggins; M Bloch; S Wiggins; S Adam; O Suchowersky; M Trew; M Klimek; C R Greenberg; M Eleff; L P Thompson
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  1992-02-15

10.  Offering cystic fibrosis carrier screening to an HMO population: factors associated with utilization.

Authors:  E S Tambor; B A Bernhardt; G A Chase; R R Faden; G Geller; K J Hofman; N A Holtzman
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 11.025

View more
  2 in total

1.  Factors Motivating Individuals to Consider Genetic Testing for Type 2 Diabetes Risk Prediction.

Authors:  Jennifer Wessel; Jyoti Gupta; Mary de Groot
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Clinical and molecular characterization of maturity onset-diabetes of the young caused by hepatocyte nuclear factor-4 alpha mutation: red flags for prediction of the diagnosis.

Authors:  Sarar Mohamed; Susan Elkholy; Ebtessam El-Meleagy; Khaled Abu-Amero; Ali M Hellani
Journal:  Ann Saudi Med       Date:  2014 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.526

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.