Literature DB >> 15660121

Ultrafiltration improves aortic compliance in haemodialysis patients.

E H Y Ie1, T L M De Backer, S G Carlier, W B Vletter, R W Nette, W Weimar, R Zietse.   

Abstract

An elevated pulse pressure leads to an increased pulsatile cardiac load, and results from arterial stiffening. The aim of our study was to test whether a reduction in volume overload by ultrafiltration (UF) during haemodialysis (HD) leads to an improvement of aortic compliance. In 18 patients, aortic compliance was estimated noninvasively before and after HD with UF using a pulse pressure method based on the Windkessel model. This technique has not been applied before in a dialysis population, and combines carotid pulse contour analysis by applanation tonometry with aortic outflow measurements by Doppler echocardiography. The median UF volume was 2450 ml (range 1000-4000 ml). The aortic outflow volume after HD (39 ml; 32-53 ml) was lower (P=0.01) than before (46 ml; 29-60 ml). Carotid pulse pressure after HD (42 mmHg; 25-85 mmHg) was lower (P=0.01) than before (46 mmHg; 35-93 mmHg). Carotid augmentation index after HD (22%; 3-30%) was lower (P=0.001) than before (31%; 7-53%). Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity was not different after HD (8.7 m/s; 5.6-28.9 m/s vs 7.7 m/s; 4.7-36.8 m/s). Aortic compliance after HD (1.10 ml/mmHg; 0.60-2.43 ml/mmHg) was higher (P=0.02) than before (1.05 ml/mmHg; 0.45-1.69 ml/mmHg). The increase in aortic stiffness in HD patients is partly caused by a reversible reduction of aortic compliance due to volume expansion. Volume withdrawal by HD moves the arterial wall characteristics back to a more favourable position on the nonlinear pressure-volume curve, reflected in a concomitant decrease in arterial pressure and improved aortic compliance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15660121     DOI: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1001813

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hum Hypertens        ISSN: 0950-9240            Impact factor:   3.012


  5 in total

1.  Ambulatory recording of wave reflections and arterial stiffness during intra- and interdialytic periods in patients treated with dialysis.

Authors:  Antonios Karpetas; Pantelis A Sarafidis; Panagiotis I Georgianos; Athanase Protogerou; Pantelis Vakianis; Georgios Koutroumpas; Vasileios Raptis; Dimitrios N Stamatiadis; Christos Syrganis; Vassilios Liakopoulos; Georgios Efstratiadis; Anastasios N Lasaridis
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 8.237

2.  Contribution of volume overload to the arterial stiffness of hemodialysis patients.

Authors:  Łukasz Czyżewski; Janusz Wyzgał; Emilia Czyżewska; Janusz Sierdziński; Łukasz Szarpak
Journal:  Ren Fail       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 2.606

3.  Kidney disease parameters, metabolic goal achievement, and arterial stiffness risk in Chinese adult people with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Chen Xu; Li Li; Juan Shi; Bangqun Ji; Qidong Zheng; Yufan Wang; Tingyu Ke; Li Li; Dong Zhao; Yuancheng Dai; Fengmei Xu; Ying Peng; Yifei Zhang; Qijuan Dong; Weiqing Wang
Journal:  J Diabetes       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Membrane Bioincompatibility and Ultrafiltration Effects on Pulse Wave Analysis during Haemodialysis.

Authors:  Maria-Pau Valenzuela; Jaume Almirall; María-José Amengual
Journal:  ISRN Nephrol       Date:  2012-12-17

5.  Inter- and intradialytic fluid volume changes and vascular stiffness parameters in patients on hemodialysis.

Authors:  Aya Lafta; Judy Ukrainetz; Sara Davison; Stephanie Thompson; Aminu Bello; Branko Braam
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.