Literature DB >> 15659897

Application of strict radiologic criteria to define success in laparoscopic pyeloplasty.

Alvin Lopez-Pujals1, Raymond J Leveillee, Carson Wong.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To review our experience and utilize rigorous radiologic criteria to establish success in laparoscopic pyeloplasty. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The hospital records of consecutive adult patients who underwent laparoscopic pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) obstruction during a 5-year period at our institution were reviewed. We identified 47 candidates for study inclusion. With one open conversion secondary to excessive fibrosis and one patient requiring repeat laparoscopic pyeloplasty for recurrence, 46 patients with 47 renal units were included for analysis. Thirteen renal units had prior surgery for UPJ obstruction. Preoperative and postoperative symptomatology were compared to determine subjective outcome. Mercaptoacetyltriglycine (MAG3) nuclear renography was performed preoperatively and postoperatively to assess differential renal function (DRF) and obstruction, defined as a T1/2 -20 minutes, and evaluate objective success. There were 34 dismembered and 13 Y-V pyeloplasties.
RESULTS: The mean operative time was 341.6 minutes (range 200-717 minutes). The mean preoperative T1/2 was 48.4 minutes (range 14 minutes-xc), with a mean DRF of 39.8% (range 22%-60%). The mean postoperative T1/2 was 9.32 minutes (range 2-27 minutes), and the mean DRF was 39.5% (range 7%-57%). The average length of hospital stay was 2.25 days (range 1-3 days). At a mean follow-up of 19.93 months (range 2-55 months), the subjective success rate was 95.7%, and the objective success rate was 93.6%.
CONCLUSION: Even when using strict radiologic criteria to define success, laparoscopic pyeloplasty is found to be similar to open surgery in its efficacy for the correction of adult UPJ obstruction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15659897     DOI: 10.1089/end.2004.18.756

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  9 in total

Review 1.  Comparison of surgical approaches to ureteropelvic junction obstruction: endopyeloplasty versus endopyelotomy versus laparoscopic pyeloplasty.

Authors:  Robert J Stein; Inderbir S Gill; Mihir M Desai
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: the standard of care for ureteropelvic junction obstruction.

Authors:  Anil Kapoor; Christopher B Allard
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  Technical modifications of double-J stenting for retroperitoneal laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty in children under 5 years old.

Authors:  Zhi Chen; Xiang Chen; Yan-Cheng Luo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Minimally invasive surgical options for ureteropelvic junction obstruction: A significant step in the right direction.

Authors:  Stephanie J Symons; Victor Palit; Chandra Shekhar Biyani; Jon J Cartledge; Anthony J Browning; Adrian D Joyce
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2009-01

Review 5.  Management of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in adults.

Authors:  Fahd Khan; Kamran Ahmed; Nikiesha Lee; Ben Challacombe; Mohammed S Khan; Prokar Dasgupta
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 14.432

6.  Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty in 47 cases.

Authors:  Anuar Ibrahim Mitre; Artur Henrique Brito; Miguel Srougi
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.365

Review 7.  An up-to-date overview of minimally invasive treatment methods in ureteropelvic junction obstruction.

Authors:  Rahmi Gokhan Ekin; Orcun Celik; Yusuf Ozlem Ilbey
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2015-06-18

8.  Laparoscopic management of primary pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction: Single-centre experience.

Authors:  Hani Nour; Ahmad Mostafa; Samir Gobashy; Hossam Elganzoury; Amr Elkholy; Essam Riad
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2011-11-12

Review 9.  Laparoscopic renal surgery is here to stay.

Authors:  Angus Chin On Luk; Rajadoss Muthu Krishna Pandian; Rakesh Heer
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2018-03-06
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.