Literature DB >> 15658994

Seasonal and substrate preferences of fungi colonizing leaves in streams: traditional versus molecular evidence.

Liliya G Nikolcheva1, Felix Bärlocher.   

Abstract

Aquatic hyphomycetes are the main fungal decomposers of plant litter in streams. We compared the importance of substrate (three leaf species, wood) and season on fungal colonization. Substrates were exposed for 12 4-week periods. After recovery, mass loss, fungal biomass and release of conidia by aquatic hyphomycetes were measured. Fungal communities were characterized by counting and identifying released conidia and by extracting and amplifying fungal DNA (ITS2), which was subdivided into phylotypes by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) and terminal-restriction fragment length polymorphism (T-RFLP). Mass loss, fungal biomass and reproduction were positively correlated with stream temperature. Conidial diversity was highest between May and September. Numbers of different phylotypes were more stable. Principal coordinate analyses (PCO) and canonical analyses of principal coordinates (CAP) of presence/absence data (DGGE bands, T-RFLP peaks and conidial species) showed a clear seasonal trend (P<or=0.002) but no substrate effect (P>or=0.88). Season was also a significant factor when proportional similarities of conidial communities or relative intensities of DGGE bands were evaluated (P<or=0.003). Substrate was a significant factor determining DGGE band intensities (P=0.002), but did not significantly affect conidial communities (P=0.50). Both traditional and molecular techniques suggest that strict exclusion of fungi by substrate type is rare, and that presence of different species or phylotypes is governed by season. Biomasses of the various taxa (based on DGGE band intensities) were related to substrate type.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15658994     DOI: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2004.00709.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 1462-2912            Impact factor:   5.491


  23 in total

1.  Possible interactions between bacterial diversity, microbial activity and supraglacial hydrology of cryoconite holes in Svalbard.

Authors:  Arwyn Edwards; Alexandre M Anesio; Sara M Rassner; Birgit Sattler; Bryn Hubbard; William T Perkins; Michael Young; Gareth W Griffith
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2010-07-22       Impact factor: 10.302

2.  Fungi in the hyporheic zone of a springbrook.

Authors:  F Bärlocher; L G Nikolcheva; K P Wilson; D D Williams
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2006-08-15       Impact factor: 4.552

3.  Diversity of fungi, bacteria, and actinomycetes on leaves decomposing in a stream.

Authors:  Mitali Das; Todd V Royer; Laura G Leff
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-12-01       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Q-RT-PCR for assessing archaea, bacteria, and fungi during leaf decomposition in a stream.

Authors:  Mayura A Manerkar; S Seena; Felix Bärlocher
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2008-02-09       Impact factor: 4.552

5.  Realized fungal diversity increases functional stability of leaf litter decomposition under zinc stress.

Authors:  Cláudia Pascoal; Fernanda Cássio; Liliya Nikolcheva; Felix Bärlocher
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2009-07-24       Impact factor: 4.552

6.  Seasonal Variability May Affect Microbial Decomposers and Leaf Decomposition More Than Warming in Streams.

Authors:  Sofia Duarte; Fernanda Cássio; Verónica Ferreira; Cristina Canhoto; Cláudia Pascoal
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 4.552

7.  Alteration of microbial communities colonizing leaf litter in a temperate woodland stream by growth of trees under conditions of elevated atmospheric CO2.

Authors:  John J Kelly; Amit Bansal; Jonathan Winkelman; Lori R Janus; Shannon Hell; Marie Wencel; Patricia Belt; Kevin A Kuehn; Steven T Rier; Nancy C Tuchman
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Whole-stream nitrate addition affects litter decomposition and associated fungi but not invertebrates.

Authors:  Verónica Ferreira; Vladislav Gulis; Manuel A S Graça
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2006-07-21       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Fungal propagules and DNA in feces of two detritus-feeding amphipods.

Authors:  Kandikere Ramaiah Sridhar; Margaret Beaton; Felix Bärlocher
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2010-08-10       Impact factor: 4.552

10.  Microbial decomposer communities are mainly structured by trophic status in circumneutral and alkaline streams.

Authors:  Sofia Duarte; Cláudia Pascoal; Frédéric Garabétian; Fernanda Cássio; Jean-Yves Charcosset
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-07-31       Impact factor: 4.792

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.