Literature DB >> 15658945

An assessment of the burden of migraine using the willingness to pay model.

S W Hamelsky1, R B Lipton, W F Stewart.   

Abstract

Willingness to pay methods measure treatment preferences and also measure the burden of illness in economic terms. We used a contingent valuation method to measure migraine sufferers' willingness to pay (WTP) for acute medication for their most severe headache attacks, based on various profiles of treatment benefits and the characteristics of the migraine sufferer. Subjects were identified from a population-based database of migraine sufferers, previously recruited by random digit dialing. Telephone interviews (n = 1428) were used to gather demographic and headache characteristics. Subjects who met the International Headache Society criteria for migraine with or without aura and satisfied the other inclusion criteria based on telephone interview (n = 312) were invited to participate in a mailed questionnaire study. The questionnaire was mailed to the 310 subjects who agreed to participate and 201 (65%) surveys were returned. The survey included questions on the demographics, the migraine characteristics, and the psychological disposition of the respondents. WTP for an acute migraine treatment with 14 different hypothetical treatment profiles was explored. Responders and non-responders to the survey were generally similar. The newly designed WTP questionnaire had high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha 0.90) and test-retest reliability (Spearman's correlation coefficients 0.71-0.77). Study subjects were willing to pay a median price of US 5 dollars for a migraine treatment that provided complete relief in 30 min and worked 100% of the time, with no side-effects and no headache recurrence. Median WTP decreased as treatment attributes deviated from this ideal. For example, WTP declined to a median of US 1 dollar for complete relief in 2 h and to US 0.25 dollars for complete relief in 4 h. All of the medication attributes powerfully influenced WTP. Several variables predicted WTP including current payment for medication, MIDAS (Grade III), and those with headaches of long duration. Subjects who employed a greater number of coping skills were less willing to pay. Patient demographics and migraine severity predict WTP, but treatment attributes were also important. As treatment improves, WTP for migraine medications is likely to increase.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15658945     DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2005.00797.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cephalalgia        ISSN: 0333-1024            Impact factor:   6.292


  12 in total

Review 1.  Cost-of-illness studies : a review of current methods.

Authors:  Ebere Akobundu; Jing Ju; Lisa Blatt; C Daniel Mullins
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 2.  Impact of headache in Europe: a review for the Eurolight project.

Authors:  Lars Jacob Stovner; Colette Andrée
Journal:  J Headache Pain       Date:  2008-04-17       Impact factor: 7.277

Review 3.  Newer formulations of the triptans: advances in migraine management.

Authors:  Jonathan Paul Gladstone; Marek Gawel
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 4.  Migraine and psychiatric comorbidity: a review of clinical findings.

Authors:  Fabio Antonaci; Giuseppe Nappi; Federica Galli; Gian Camillo Manzoni; Paolo Calabresi; Alfredo Costa
Journal:  J Headache Pain       Date:  2011-01-06       Impact factor: 7.277

5.  Acupuncture or low frequency infrared treatment for low back pain in Chinese patients: a discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  Li-Chia Chen; Li-Jen Cheng; Yan Zhang; Xin He; Roger D Knaggs
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Effects of Vestibular Rehabilitation in the Management of a Vestibular Migraine: A Review.

Authors:  Ahmad H Alghadir; Shahnawaz Anwer
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 4.003

7.  Investigating Patients' Preferences to Inform Drug Development Decisions: Novel Insights from a Discrete Choice Experiment in Migraine.

Authors:  Aleksandra Torbica; Carla Rognoni; Rosanna Tarricone
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Primary headache disorders at a tertiary health facility in Lagos, Nigeria: prevalence and consultation patterns.

Authors:  Olajumoke Oshinaike; Oluwadamilola Ojo; Njideka Okubadejo; Olaitan Ojelabi; Akinola Dada
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  What do patients consider to be the most important outcomes for effectiveness studies on migraine treatment? Results of a Delphi study.

Authors:  Antonia F H Smelt; Mark A Louter; Dennis A Kies; Jeanet W Blom; Gisela M Terwindt; Geert J M G van der Heijden; Véronique De Gucht; Michel D Ferrari; Willem J J Assendelft
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-16       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Validation of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) and GAD-2 in patients with migraine.

Authors:  Jong-Geun Seo; Sung-Pa Park
Journal:  J Headache Pain       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 7.277

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.