Literature DB >> 15658141

Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis: twenty years follow-up in 174 patients.

Michael M Krausz1, Simon D Duek.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis has become the surgical procedure of choice for patients with ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the long-term functional outcome of patients who underwent this surgical procedure.
METHODS: We performed this observational study in 174 consecutive patients: 146 with UC and 28 with FAP. The patients, 91 males and 83 females with a mean age of 34.1+/-10.6 years (range 6-67 years), underwent the procedure between January 1984 and January 2004 (mean follow-up 64.8 months, range 1-240 months). The indications for surgery were intractable disease in 124 patients (71%), dysplasia in 36 (21%), severe bleeding in 8 (5%), and perforation in 6 (3%).
RESULTS: A protective ileostomy was performed in 140 patients (96%) with UC and 12 (43%) with FAP. An urgent three-stage procedure was necessary in 14 patients (8.4%). A mucosal proctectomy was performed in 94 (54%), and a double stapling technique in 80 (46%). Mean length of hospital stay was 9.4+/-6.6 days (range 5-34 days, median 8). Complications included pelvic sepsis in 7 patients (4.2%), anastomotic leakage in 8 (4.8%), bowel obstruction in 22 (13.2%), incisional hernia in 12 (7.2%), anastomotic stenosis that usually responded to manual dilatation in 46 (27.6%), pouchitis in 106 (61%), recto-vaginal fistula in 3 (1.8%), retrograde ejaculation in 3 (1.8%), and impotence in 2 (1.2%). There was no mortality in this group of patients. The median number of bowel movements per 24 hours was six in UC patients and five in FAP patients, with at least one bowel movement during the night. Complete daytime and night-time continence was documented in 124 patients (71%). Overall satisfaction was 95%.
CONCLUSIONS: Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis confers a long-term good quality of life to both UC and FAP patients, and the majority of patients are fully continent with five to six bowel movements per day.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15658141

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Isr Med Assoc J            Impact factor:   0.892


  10 in total

1.  Functional outcome and quality of life following restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis in Indians.

Authors:  Uday Somashekar; Subash Gupta; Arvinder Soin; Samiran Nundy
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Predictors of proctocolectomy in children with ulcerative colitis.

Authors:  Lorraine I Kelley-Quon; Howard C Jen; David A Ziring; Neera Gupta; Barbara S Kirschner; George D Ferry; Stanley A Cohen; Harland S Winter; Melvin B Heyman; Benjamin D Gold; Stephen B Shew
Journal:  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 2.839

3.  Long-term outcome 10 years or more after restorative proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in patients with ulcerative colitis.

Authors:  Christine Leowardi; Ulf Hinz; Mirjam Tariverdian; Peter Kienle; Christian Herfarth; Alexis Ulrich; Martina Kadmon
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2009-03-12       Impact factor: 3.445

4.  Technical considerations in children undergoing laparoscopic ileal-J-pouch anorectal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis.

Authors:  Girolamo Mattioli; Edoardo Guida; Alessio Pini-Prato; Stefano Avanzini; Valentina Rossi; Arrigo Barabino; Arnold G Coran; Vincenzo Jasonni
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 1.827

Review 5.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of the outcome of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in patients with ulcerative colitis versus patients with familial adenomatous polyposis.

Authors:  S H Emile; S M Khan; E Silva-Alvarenga; Z Garoufalia; S D Wexner
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 3.699

6.  Does mesorectal preservation protect the ileoanal anastomosis after restorative proctocolectomy?

Authors:  Andreas D Rink; Irina Radinski; Karl-Heinz Vestweber
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-09-03       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Outcomes and cost of diverted versus undiverted restorative proctocolectomy.

Authors:  Anne M Stey; Robert H Brook; Emmett Keeler; Michael T Harris; Tomas Heimann; Randolph M Steinhagen
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Long-term followup with evaluation of the surgical and functional results of the ileal pouch reservoir in restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis.

Authors:  Ola Røkke; Knut Iversen; Torill Olsen; Sølvi-Mai Ristesund; Geir Egil Eide; Gitta Erika Turowski
Journal:  ISRN Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-06-16

9.  Long-Term Followup of Patients with Active J-Reservoirs after Restorative Proctocolectomy for Ulcerative Colitis with regard to Reservoir Function, Mucosal Changes, and Quality of Life.

Authors:  Ola Røkke; Knut Iversen; Torill Olsen; Sølvi-May Ristesund; Geir Egil Eide; Gitta Erika Turowski
Journal:  ISRN Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-07-16

Review 10.  Update of complications and functional outcome of the ileo-pouch anal anastomosis: overview of evidence and meta-analysis of 96 observational studies.

Authors:  Sharonne de Zeeuw; Usama Ahmed Ali; Usama Ahmed Ali; Rogier A R T Donders; Willem E Hueting; Frederik Keus; Cees J H M van Laarhoven
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 2.571

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.