Literature DB >> 15658119

Oscillating field stimulation for complete spinal cord injury in humans: a phase 1 trial.

Scott Shapiro1, Richard Borgens, Robert Pascuzzi, Karen Roos, Michael Groff, Scott Purvines, Richard Ben Rodgers, Shannon Hagy, Paul Nelson.   

Abstract

OBJECT: An electrical field cathode (negative pole) has trophic and tropic effects on injured spinal cord axons in in vitro and in vivo models of sea lamprey, rodent, and canine spinal cord injury (SCI) and it improves functional outcome. A human oscillating field stimulator (OFS) was built, a Food and Drug Administration (FDA) exemption number was obtained, and institutional review board approval was given for a Phase 1 trial to study 10 humans with complete motor and sensory SCI.
METHODS: Entry criteria were complete SCI between C-5 and T-10 in patients 18 to 65 years of age and no transection demonstrated on magnetic resonance imaging. All participants received the National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study (NASCIS) III methylprednisilone protocol. Cord compression and/or vertebral instability was treated before study entry. After treatment complete SCI (according to the American Spinal Injury Association [ASIA] score) remained in all patients with no somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) below the injury level after surgery or for 48 hours. All patients underwent implantation of the OFS within 18 days. Patients underwent evaluation every 2 weeks postimplantation; the OFS was explanted at 15 weeks. Independent neurological status was assessed based on the ASIA score, visual analog scale (VAS) pain score, and SSEPs at 6 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year. Statistical analyses were performed using the two-tailed Wilcoxon test and analysis of variance (ANOVA). There were no complications at insertion of the OFS; there was one case of wound infection after explantation (5% infection rate). One patient was lost to follow up after 6 months. In all 10 patients the mean VAS pain score was 8 at implantation, 2 at 6 months, and in the nine attending follow up for 1 year it remained 2. At 1 year, the mean improvement in light touch was 25.5 points (ANOVA p < 0.001, Wilcoxon test p = 0.02), the mean improvement in pinprick sensation was 20.4 points (ANOVA p < 0.001, Wilcoxon test p = 0.02), and the mean improvement in motor status was 6.3 points (ANOVA p < 0.01, Wilcoxon test p = 0.02). Of five cases involving cervical cord injuries, bilateral upper-extremity SSEPs were normal in one, unilateral upper-extremity SSEPs were recovered in four, bilateral upper-extremity SSEPs were recovered in one, and abnormal lower-extremity SSEPs resolved in one case. In one of the five cases involving thoracic injuries an abnormal lower-extremity SSEP resolved.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of OFS treatment in patients with SCI is safe, reliable, and easy. Compared with the outcomes obtained in compliant NASCIS III plegic patients, the results of the present study indicate efficacy, and the FDA has given permission for enrollment of 10 additional patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15658119     DOI: 10.3171/spi.2005.2.1.0003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine        ISSN: 1547-5646


  49 in total

Review 1.  Neural regeneration: lessons from regenerating and non-regenerating systems.

Authors:  Leonardo M R Ferreira; Elisa M Floriddia; Giorgia Quadrato; Simone Di Giovanni
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 5.590

2.  Embryonic zebrafish neuronal growth is not affected by an applied electric field in vitro.

Authors:  Peter Cormie; Kenneth R Robinson
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2006-11-07       Impact factor: 3.046

3.  Modulating endogenous electric currents in human corneal wounds--a novel approach of bioelectric stimulation without electrodes.

Authors:  Brian Reid; Enrique O Graue-Hernandez; Mark J Mannis; Min Zhao
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.651

Review 4.  Bioelectric mechanisms in regeneration: Unique aspects and future perspectives.

Authors:  Michael Levin
Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2009-05-03       Impact factor: 7.727

5.  Electrical stimulation of schwann cells promotes sustained increases in neurite outgrowth.

Authors:  Abigail N Koppes; Andrea L Nordberg; Gina M Paolillo; Nicole M Goodsell; Haley A Darwish; Linxia Zhang; Deanna M Thompson
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 6.  Guidelines for the conduct of clinical trials for spinal cord injury as developed by the ICCP panel: clinical trial design.

Authors:  D Lammertse; M H Tuszynski; J D Steeves; A Curt; J W Fawcett; C Rask; J F Ditunno; M G Fehlings; J D Guest; P H Ellaway; N Kleitman; A R Blight; B H Dobkin; R Grossman; H Katoh; A Privat; M Kalichman
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2006-12-19       Impact factor: 2.772

Review 7.  Recent Developments in Electrotaxis Assays.

Authors:  Jiandong Wu; Francis Lin
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 4.730

8.  Robust neurite extension following exogenous electrical stimulation within single walled carbon nanotube-composite hydrogels.

Authors:  A N Koppes; K W Keating; A L McGregor; R A Koppes; K R Kearns; A M Ziemba; C A McKay; J M Zuidema; C J Rivet; R J Gilbert; D M Thompson
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2016-05-07       Impact factor: 8.947

Review 9.  Translational spinal cord injury research: preclinical guidelines and challenges.

Authors:  Paul J Reier; Michael A Lane; Edward D Hall; Y D Teng; Dena R Howland
Journal:  Handb Clin Neurol       Date:  2012

Review 10.  Role of electrical stimulation for rehabilitation and regeneration after spinal cord injury: an overview.

Authors:  Samar Hamid; Ray Hayek
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-08-02       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.