Literature DB >> 15657767

The generalized force-velocity relationship explains why the preferred pedaling rate of cyclists exceeds the most efficient one.

Götz Kohler1, Urs Boutellier.   

Abstract

The most efficient pedaling rate (lowest oxygen consumption) at a workload of 50-300 W has been reported to be in the range of 42-60 rpm. By contrast, most competitive cyclists prefer a pedaling rate of more than 90 rpm. The reason for this difference is still unknown. We assume that the high pedaling rate preferred by cyclists can be explained by the inherent properties of muscle fibers. To obtain statements which do not depend on muscle's cross-section and length, we generalized Hill's characteristic equations where muscle force and heat liberation are related to shortening velocity. A pedaling rate of f (etamax) yields to maximal efficiency, whereas the higher pedaling rate f (Pmax) leads to maximal power. The ratio f (Pmax)/f (etamax) between these two pedaling rates ranges from 1.7 to 2.4, and it depends on the muscle's fiber-type composition. In sprints and competitions of very short duration, f (Pmax) is more advantageous because energy supply is not the predominant limiting factor. The price to be paid for the most powerful pedaling rate is lower efficiency and higher energy cost. In longer exercises, economy is more important and the optimal pedaling rate shifts toward f (etamax). We conclude that the optimal pedaling rate, representing the fastest race performance, is not fixed but depends on race duration; it ranges between f (etamax) and f (Pmax). Our results are not only of interest for competitive cyclists but also for investigations using cycle ergometers: maximum power might not be reached by using a pedaling rate near the most efficient one.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15657767     DOI: 10.1007/s00421-004-1283-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol        ISSN: 1439-6319            Impact factor:   3.078


  16 in total

1.  Cadence, power, and muscle activation in cycle ergometry.

Authors:  B R MacIntosh; R R Neptune; J F Horton
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 5.411

2.  Aerobic and anaerobic power characteristics of off-road cyclists.

Authors:  R Baron
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.411

Review 3.  Cycling on Earth, in space, on the Moon.

Authors:  P E di Prampero
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  THE EFFECT OF LOAD ON THE HEAT OF SHORTENING OF MUSCLE.

Authors:  A V HILL
Journal:  Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1964-01-14

5.  Thermodynamics and the interpretation of biological heat measurements.

Authors:  D R WILKIE
Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol       Date:  1960       Impact factor: 3.667

6.  Effect of internal work on the calculation of optimal pedaling rates.

Authors:  J J Widrick; P S Freedson; J Hamill
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 5.411

7.  Cycling cadence alters exercise hemodynamics.

Authors:  R W Gotshall; T A Bauer; S L Fahrner
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 3.118

8.  Power output and fatigue of human muscle in maximal cycling exercise.

Authors:  N McCartney; G J Heigenhauser; N L Jones
Journal:  J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol       Date:  1983-07

9.  Changes in sarcomere length and physiological properties in immobilized muscle.

Authors:  P E Williams; G Goldspink
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  1978-12       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 10.  Human power output and muscle fatigue.

Authors:  A J Sargeant
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 3.118

View more
  15 in total

1.  Influence of road incline and body position on power-cadence relationship in endurance cycling.

Authors:  Umberto Emanuele; Jachen Denoth
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-11-02       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  The energetically optimal cadence decreases after prolonged cycling exercise.

Authors:  Simon Annaheim; Urs Boutellier; Götz Kohler
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-04-06       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Muscle coordination limits efficiency and power output of human limb movement under a wide range of mechanical demands.

Authors:  Ollie M Blake; James M Wakeling
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Effect of cycling position on oxygen uptake and preferred cadence in trained cyclists during hill climbing at various power outputs.

Authors:  Chris Harnish; Deborah King; Tom Swensen
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2006-12-13       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Interactions between cadence and power output effects on mechanical efficiency during sub maximal cycling exercises.

Authors:  Pierre Samozino; Samozino Pierre; Nicolas Horvais; Horvais Nicolas; Frédérique Hintzy; Hintzy Frédérique
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2006-02-01       Impact factor: 3.078

6.  Strength training reduces freely chosen pedal rate during submaximal cycling.

Authors:  Ernst Albin Hansen; Truls Raastad; Jostein Hallén
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2007-07-19       Impact factor: 3.078

7.  The role of the slope of oxygen consumption and EMG activity on freely chosen pedal rate selection.

Authors:  Nicolas Bessot; Sébastien Moussay; Sylvain Laborde; Antoine Gauthier; Bruno Sesboüé; Damien Davenne
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2008-02-12       Impact factor: 3.078

8.  Influence of crank length and crank width on maximal hand cycling power and cadence.

Authors:  Christian Krämer; Lutz Hilker; Harald Böhm
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2009-05-12       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 9.  Efficiency in cycling: a review.

Authors:  Gertjan Ettema; Håvard Wuttudal Lorås
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2009-02-20       Impact factor: 3.078

10.  Anaerobic performance and metabolism in boys and male adolescents.

Authors:  Ralph Beneke; Matthias Hütler; Renate M Leithäuser
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2007-08-21       Impact factor: 3.078

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.