J E Ferrie1, M Kivimäki, J Head, M J Shipley, J Vahtera, M G Marmot. 1. International Centre for Health and Society, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London Medical School, UK. j.ferrie@public-health.ucl.ac.uk <j.ferrie@public-health.ucl.ac.uk>
Abstract
AIM: To compare self-reported sickness absence days in the last 12 months with recorded absences from the employers' registers for the same period. METHODS: Self-reported sickness absence data over the 12 months preceding baseline (1985-88) were compared with absence records from the employers' registers over the same period for 2406 women and 5589 men, participants in the Whitehall II study of British civil servants. Associations with self-rated health, longstanding illness, minor psychiatric disorder, physical illness, and prevalent coronary heart disease at baseline were determined. RESULTS: In general, women reported less sickness absence over the last year than was recorded in the employers' registers, while men, with the exception of those in the lower employment grades, reported more. Agreement between self-reported and recorded absence days decreased as the total number of days increased. After adjustment for employment grade and the average number of recorded and self-reported absence days, the total number of self-reported absence days was within two days of the recorded number of days for 63% of women and 67% of men. Associations between annual self-reported sickness absence days and self-rated health, longstanding illness, minor psychiatric disorder, physical illness, and prevalent coronary heart disease were as strong as those for recorded absence days. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that agreement between the annual number of self-reported and the annual number of recorded sickness absence days is relatively good in both sexes and that associations with health are equivalent for both measures.
AIM: To compare self-reported sickness absence days in the last 12 months with recorded absences from the employers' registers for the same period. METHODS: Self-reported sickness absence data over the 12 months preceding baseline (1985-88) were compared with absence records from the employers' registers over the same period for 2406 women and 5589 men, participants in the Whitehall II study of British civil servants. Associations with self-rated health, longstanding illness, minor psychiatric disorder, physical illness, and prevalent coronary heart disease at baseline were determined. RESULTS: In general, women reported less sickness absence over the last year than was recorded in the employers' registers, while men, with the exception of those in the lower employment grades, reported more. Agreement between self-reported and recorded absence days decreased as the total number of days increased. After adjustment for employment grade and the average number of recorded and self-reported absence days, the total number of self-reported absence days was within two days of the recorded number of days for 63% of women and 67% of men. Associations between annual self-reported sickness absence days and self-rated health, longstanding illness, minor psychiatric disorder, physical illness, and prevalent coronary heart disease were as strong as those for recorded absence days. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that agreement between the annual number of self-reported and the annual number of recorded sickness absence days is relatively good in both sexes and that associations with health are equivalent for both measures.
Authors: Mika Kivimäki; Pauli Forma; Juhani Wikström; Tuomo Halmeenmäki; Jaana Pentti; Marko Elovainio; Jussi Vahtera Journal: J Epidemiol Community Health Date: 2004-08 Impact factor: 3.710
Authors: M G Marmot; G D Smith; S Stansfeld; C Patel; F North; J Head; I White; E Brunner; A Feeney Journal: Lancet Date: 1991-06-08 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Constanze Leineweber; Hugo Westerlund; Jan Hagberg; Pia Svedberg; Kristina Alexanderson Journal: Int Arch Occup Environ Health Date: 2012-01-24 Impact factor: 3.015
Authors: Simo Taimela; Esa Läärä; Antti Malmivaara; Jaakko Tiekso; Harri Sintonen; Selina Justén; Timo Aro Journal: Occup Environ Med Date: 2007-02-15 Impact factor: 4.402
Authors: Corné A M Roelen; Willem van Rhenen; Johan W Groothoff; Jac J L van der Klink; Ute Bültmann Journal: Int Arch Occup Environ Health Date: 2013-02-22 Impact factor: 3.015
Authors: Laura Viester; Evert A L M Verhagen; Paulien M Bongers; Allard J van der Beek Journal: Int Arch Occup Environ Health Date: 2014-12-07 Impact factor: 3.015
Authors: Gavin Andrews; Alice Kemp; Matthew Sunderland; Michael Von Korff; Tevik Bedirhan Ustun Journal: PLoS One Date: 2009-12-17 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Erwin M Speklé; Judith Heinrich; Marco J M Hoozemans; Birgitte M Blatter; Allard J van der Beek; Jaap H van Dieën; Maurits W van Tulder Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2010-11-11 Impact factor: 2.362
Authors: David Ogilvie; Simon Griffin; Andy Jones; Roger Mackett; Cornelia Guell; Jenna Panter; Natalia Jones; Simon Cohn; Lin Yang; Cheryl Chapman Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2010-11-16 Impact factor: 3.295