Literature DB >> 15656950

Young deaf children with hearing aids or cochlear implants: early assessment package for monitoring progress.

Thomas P Nikolopoulos1, Sue M Archbold, Susan Gregory.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Very few assessment measures exist for evaluating progress in young deaf children with hearing aids and cochlear implants.
OBJECTIVE: To introduce and describe an early assessment package that covers auditory perception, communication/language development, and speech production in very young deaf children. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Seven of the assessment measures (Listening Progress Profile, Categories of Auditory Performance, Tait Video Analysis, Stories-Narratives Assessment Procedure, Profile of Actual Linguistic Skills, Speech Intelligibility Rating, and the Profile of Actual Speech Skills) have been specifically developed at the Nottingham Cochlear Implant Programme, and a further one (Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale) was modified for use within the package. Moreover, two commercially available tests (Pragmatics Profile of Everyday Communication Skills and Preschool Language Scale) are included to complete the package.
METHODS: The present paper describes each measure, how to use it, and its time frame. In addition, two case studies demonstrate the usefulness of the package as a whole. RESULTS AND
CONCLUSIONS: The Nottingham Early Assessment Package (NEAP) offers a framework with which to assess in young deaf children the use of audition and language and communication in real-life situations. Being simple, reliable, and time effective can be used in everyday clinical practice. NEAP is innovative in design and offers a structured approach to monitor very young deaf children, both in short and long term. In addition, it allows the identification of additional problems and areas of difficulty as well as specific abilities and skills. This enables the clinician to determine appropriate intervention strategies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15656950     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2004.08.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0165-5876            Impact factor:   1.675


  14 in total

1.  The relationship of audibility and the development of canonical babbling in young children with hearing impairment.

Authors:  Sandie M Bass-Ringdahl
Journal:  J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ       Date:  2010-05-10

2.  Outcome of cochlear implantation in children with cochlear malformations.

Authors:  Jesper Bille; Vibeke Fink-Jensen; Therese Ovesen
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-01-10       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Factors Influencing Elementary and High-School Aged Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Emily A Tobey; Ann E Geers; Madhu Sundarrajan; Janet Lane
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  The effect of GJB2 and SLC26A4 gene mutations on rehabilitative outcomes in pediatric cochlear implant patients.

Authors:  Yu-jun Yan; Yun Li; Tao Yang; Qi Huang; Hao Wu
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  In an era of bilateral funding and changing criteria, when is unilateral cochlear implantation a better option?

Authors:  Olivia Ferguson; Cristina Simões-Franklin; Peter Walshe; Fergal Glynn; Laura Viani
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 3.236

6.  Early Postimplant Speech Perception and Language Skills Predict Long-Term Language and Neurocognitive Outcomes Following Pediatric Cochlear Implantation.

Authors:  Cynthia R Hunter; William G Kronenberger; Irina Castellanos; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  What factors are associated with good performance in children with cochlear implants? From the outcome of various language development tests, research on sensory and communicative disorders project in Japan: nagasaki experience.

Authors:  Yukihiko Kanda; Hidetaka Kumagami; Minoru Hara; Yuzuru Sainoo; Chisei Sato; Tomomi Yamamoto-Fukuda; Haruo Yoshida; Akiko Ito; Chiharu Tanaka; Kyoko Baba; Ayaka Nakata; Hideo Tanaka; Kunihiro Fukushima; Norio Kasai; Haruo Takahashi
Journal:  Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 3.372

8.  Long Term Speech Perception Outcomes of Cochlear Implantation in Gap Junction Protein Beta 2 Related Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Sung Hee Kim; Rajendra Nepali; Myung Hoon Yoo; Kwang-Sun Lee; Jong Woo Chung
Journal:  J Audiol Otol       Date:  2017-07-05

9.  A preliminary study of auditory mismatch response on the day of cochlear implant activation in children with hearing aids prior implantation.

Authors:  Yuan Li; Min Shen; Mo Long
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Assessment of outcomes of hearing and speech rehabilitation in children with cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Shaofeng Liu; Fang Wang; Peipei Chen; Na Zuo; Cheng Wu; Jun Ma; Jingjiang Huang; Chuanxi Wang
Journal:  J Otol       Date:  2019-02-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.