Literature DB >> 15656766

Inconsistency in reaction time across the life span.

Benjamin R Williams1, David F Hultsch, Esther H Strauss, Michael A Hunter, Rosemary Tannock.   

Abstract

Inconsistency in latency across trials of 2-choice reaction time data was analyzed in 273 participants ranging in age from 6 to 81 years. A U-shaped curve defined the relationship between age and inconsistency, with increases in age associated with lower inconsistency throughout childhood and higher inconsistency throughout adulthood. Differences in inconsistency were independent of practice, fatigue, and age-related differences in mean level of performance. Evidence for general and specific variability-producing processes was found in those aged less than 21 years, whereas only a specific process, such as attentional blocks, was evident for those 21 years and older. The findings highlight the importance of considering moment-to-moment changes in performance in psychological research. 2005 APA

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15656766     DOI: 10.1037/0894-4105.19.1.88

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychology        ISSN: 0894-4105            Impact factor:   3.295


  59 in total

1.  Functional brain connectivity at rest changes after working memory training.

Authors:  Dietsje D Jolles; Mark A van Buchem; Eveline A Crone; Serge A R B Rombouts
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 2.  The cognitive neuroscience of ageing.

Authors:  Cheryl Grady
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 34.870

3.  Lap Time Variability From a 400-m Walk Is Associated With Future Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer's Disease.

Authors:  Qu Tian; Susan M Resnick; Stephanie A Studenski; Luigi Ferrucci
Journal:  J Am Med Dir Assoc       Date:  2019-06-18       Impact factor: 4.669

Review 4.  The predictive brain state: asynchrony in disorders of attention?

Authors:  Jamshid Ghajar; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  Neuroscientist       Date:  2008-12-12       Impact factor: 7.519

Review 5.  Intersection between metabolic dysfunction, high fat diet consumption, and brain aging.

Authors:  Romina M Uranga; Annadora J Bruce-Keller; Christopher D Morrison; Sun Ok Fernandez-Kim; Philip J Ebenezer; Le Zhang; Kalavathi Dasuri; Jeffrey N Keller
Journal:  J Neurochem       Date:  2010-05-06       Impact factor: 5.372

6.  The importance of being variable.

Authors:  Douglas D Garrett; Natasa Kovacevic; Anthony R McIntosh; Cheryl L Grady
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-03-23       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Individual differences, aging, and IQ in two-choice tasks.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Anjali Thapar; Gail McKoon
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 8.  Genes, cognition and brain through a COMT lens.

Authors:  D Dickinson; B Elvevåg
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2009-05-13       Impact factor: 3.590

9.  Intra-individual variability among children with ADHD on a working memory task: an ex-Gaussian approach.

Authors:  Wendy M Buzy; Deborah R Medoff; Julie B Schweitzer
Journal:  Child Neuropsychol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.500

10.  Lifespan development of stimulus-response conflict cost: similarities and differences between maturation and senescence.

Authors:  Shu-Chen Li; Dorothea Hämmerer; Viktor Müller; Bernhard Hommel; Ulman Lindenberger
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2008-11-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.