Literature DB >> 15656468

The effectiveness of a hydrogel dressing compared with standard management of pressure ulcers.

A Z Kaya1, N Turani, M Akyüz.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare a hydrogel dressing with a conservative topical wound-care regimen (gauze with povidone-iodine) for the treatment of pressure ulcers.
METHOD: A prospective study comprising 27 (24 male and three female) spinal-cord injury patients with a total of 49 pressure ulcers. Wounds were randomised into a treatment group (n=25) or control group (n=24). The primary outcome measure was the rate of wound healing (cm2/days).
RESULTS: Healing rates in the treatment group were higher than in the control group, although this was not statistically significant. Some 84% of the wounds in the treatment group and 54% in the control group epithelialised, which was statistically significant (p=0.04). The mean healing time in the treatment group was 48 days compared with 45 days for the controls.
CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that hydrogel occlusive wound dressings facilitate healing by promoting more rapid epithelialisation of pressure ulcers, when compared with conservative wound care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15656468     DOI: 10.12968/jowc.2005.14.1.26726

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Wound Care        ISSN: 0969-0700            Impact factor:   2.072


  16 in total

Review 1.  Clinical and Antibiofilm Efficacy of Antimicrobial Hydrogels.

Authors:  Simon Finnegan; Steven L Percival
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 2.  Dressings and topical agents for treating pressure ulcers.

Authors:  Maggie J Westby; Jo C Dumville; Marta O Soares; Nikki Stubbs; Gill Norman
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-06-22

3.  Relationship of inferior gluteal nerves and vessels: target for application of stimulation devices for the prevention of pressure ulcers in spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Anthony F Skalak; Michael F McGee; Gary Wu; Kath Bogie
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2007-11-30       Impact factor: 1.246

Review 4.  Pressure ulcers.

Authors:  Nicky Cullum; Emily Petherick
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2008-03-19

Review 5.  Current and Emerging Topical Antibacterials and Antiseptics: Agents, Action, and Resistance Patterns.

Authors:  Deborah A Williamson; Glen P Carter; Benjamin P Howden
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 6.  Management of non-healable or maintenance wounds with topical povidone iodine.

Authors:  Kevin Y Woo
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 7.  Wound Dressings and Comparative Effectiveness Data.

Authors:  Aditya Sood; Mark S Granick; Nancy L Tomaselli
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 8.  A systematic review of therapeutic interventions for pressure ulcers after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Mary Ann Regan; Robert W Teasell; Dalton L Wolfe; David Keast; William B Mortenson; Jo-Anne L Aubut
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.966

9.  Management of chronic pressure ulcers: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2009-07-01

Review 10.  Interventions for pressure ulcers: a summary of evidence for prevention and treatment.

Authors:  Ross A Atkinson; Nicky A Cullum
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2018-01-25       Impact factor: 2.772

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.