Literature DB >> 15655692

Assessing determinants of community biomass composition in two-species plant competition studies.

John Connolly1, Peter Wayne.   

Abstract

A method is proposed for assessing the relative importance of species identity, neighbour species influence and environment as determinants of change in community biomass composition in two-species short-term competition experiments. The method is based on modelling the differences in relative growth rates (RGR) of species (hence called the RGRD method). Using a multiple regression approach it quantifies the effects of initial species' abundance, species identity and environment on RGRD and hence on change in community biomass composition. The RGRD approach is relatively simple to use and deals readily with statistical difficulties associated with correlated responses between species from the same stand. It can be easily adapted to analyse sequential harvest data. An example based on data from two-species mixtures of the annual species Stellaria media and Poa annua is used to illustrate the method. The main determinant of change in community biomass composition was species identity, reflected in the difference in growth rates between the species. Change in community composition was not, in general, significantly affected by the influence of neighbours or fertiliser level. The unimportance of the influence of neighbours in affecting the composition of these communities contrasts with the strong role of intra- and interspecific competition in determining the size of individuals of both species (Connolly et al. in Oecologia 82:513-526, 1990).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15655692     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-004-1720-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  6 in total

1.  Plant diversity and productivity experiments in european grasslands

Authors:  A Hector; B Schmid; C Beierkuhnlein; M C Caldeira; M Diemer; P G Dimitrakopoulos; J A Finn; H Freitas; P S Giller; J Good; R Harris; P Hogberg; K Huss-Danell; J Joshi; A Jumpponen; C Korner; P W Leadley; M Loreau; A Minns; C P Mulder; G O'Donovan; S J Otway; J S Pereira; A Prinz; D J Read; M Scherer-Lorenzen; E D Schulze; A S D Siamantziouras; E M Spehn; A C Terry; A Y Troumbis; F I Woodward; S Yachi; J H Lawton
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-11-05       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Interspecific competition in plants: how well do current methods answer fundamental questions?

Authors:  J Connolly; P Wayne; F A Bazzaz
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.926

3.  On the use of response models in mixture experiments.

Authors:  J Connolly
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Time course of plant-plant interactions in experimental mixtures of annuals: density, frequency, and nutrient effects.

Authors:  J Connolly; P Wayne; R Murray
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  The intensity of competition versus its importance: an overlooked distinction and some implications.

Authors:  C W Welden; W L Slauson
Journal:  Q Rev Biol       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 4.875

6.  Asymmetric competition between plant species.

Authors:  J Connolly; P Wayne
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 3.225

  6 in total
  1 in total

1.  Convergence patterns and multiple species interactions in a designed plant mixture of five species.

Authors:  Matthias Suter; Dieter Ramseier; Sabine Guesewell; John Connolly
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2007-01-16       Impact factor: 3.298

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.