OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to determine if pain and distress during the retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) screening examination could be ameliorated by providing comfort care. STUDY DESIGN: This study was a prospective, randomized, controlled trial of 30 stable preterm infants who underwent initial ROP screening examinations. Fourteen study infants were swaddled, held, and given 24% sucrose solution during the examination. Sixteen controls were examined while lying in their cribs. Vital signs (i.e., pulse rate, respiratory rate, and oxygen saturation), crying time, and time for the vital signs to return to baseline values were recorded at different times during the examination. RESULTS: The vital signs did not vary significantly between the two groups. The participants in the control group had a trend of longer crying time, but this trend did not reach a level of statistical significance. In addition, The time required for the vital signs to return to their baseline values did not vary significantly. CONCLUSION:ROP screening is very distressful for preterm infants. The routine use of comfort care to reduce pain during the examination could not be supported by this study.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to determine if pain and distress during the retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) screening examination could be ameliorated by providing comfort care. STUDY DESIGN: This study was a prospective, randomized, controlled trial of 30 stable preterm infants who underwent initial ROP screening examinations. Fourteen study infants were swaddled, held, and given 24% sucrose solution during the examination. Sixteen controls were examined while lying in their cribs. Vital signs (i.e., pulse rate, respiratory rate, and oxygen saturation), crying time, and time for the vital signs to return to baseline values were recorded at different times during the examination. RESULTS: The vital signs did not vary significantly between the two groups. The participants in the control group had a trend of longer crying time, but this trend did not reach a level of statistical significance. In addition, The time required for the vital signs to return to their baseline values did not vary significantly. CONCLUSION: ROP screening is very distressful for preterm infants. The routine use of comfort care to reduce pain during the examination could not be supported by this study.
Authors: Dan Ni Wang; Kyla Lavery; Stacey Dalgleish; Alexandra Howlett; Vivian E Hill; Stephanie A Dotchin Journal: J Perinatol Date: 2020-10-15 Impact factor: 2.521
Authors: Kelly C Wade; Maxwell Pistilli; Agnieshka Baumritter; Karen Karp; Alice Gong; Alex R Kemper; Gui-Shuang Ying; Graham Quinn Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2015-08-20 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: Grace M Richter; Steven L Williams; Justin Starren; John T Flynn; Michael F Chiang Journal: Surv Ophthalmol Date: 2009-08-08 Impact factor: 6.048
Authors: S Grace Prakalapakorn; Sharon F Freedman; Amy K Hutchinson; David K Wallace; Sandra S Stinnett; J Wayne Riggins; Keith J Gallaher Journal: Ophthalmol Retina Date: 2018-01-10
Authors: E M Boyle; Y Freer; Z Khan-Orakzai; M Watkinson; E Wright; J R Ainsworth; N McIntosh Journal: Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed Date: 2006-01-20 Impact factor: 5.747