BACKGROUND: Despite the potential usefulness of administrative databases for evaluating outcomes, coding of heart failure and associated comorbidities have not been definitively compared with clinical data. OBJECTIVE: To compare the predictive value of heart failure diagnoses and secondary conditions identified in a large administrative database with chart-based records. METHODS: The authors studied 1808 patient records sampled from 14 acute care hospitals and compared clinically recorded data with administrative records from the Canadian Institute for Health Information. The impact of comorbidity coding in the administrative data set according to the Charlson classification was examined in models of 30-day mortality. RESULTS: The positive predictive value (PPV) of a primary diagnosis ICD-9 428 was 94.3% using the Framingham criteria and 88.6% using criteria previously validated with pulmonary capillary wedge pressure. There was reduced prevalence of secondary comorbid conditions in administrative data in comparison with clinical chart data. The specificities and PPV/negative predictive values of administratively identified index comorbidities were high. The sensitivities of index comorbidities were low, but were enhanced by examination of hospitalizations within 1 year prior to the index heart failure admission. Using information from prior hospitalizations modestly enhanced 30-day mortality model performance; however, the odds ratio point estimates of the index and enhanced administrative data sets were consistent with the clinical model. CONCLUSION: The ICD-9 428 primary diagnosis is highly predictive of heart failure using clinical criteria. Examination of hospitalization data up to 1 year prior to the index admission improves comorbidity detection and may provide enhancements to future studies of heart failure mortality.
BACKGROUND: Despite the potential usefulness of administrative databases for evaluating outcomes, coding of heart failure and associated comorbidities have not been definitively compared with clinical data. OBJECTIVE: To compare the predictive value of heart failure diagnoses and secondary conditions identified in a large administrative database with chart-based records. METHODS: The authors studied 1808 patient records sampled from 14 acute care hospitals and compared clinically recorded data with administrative records from the Canadian Institute for Health Information. The impact of comorbidity coding in the administrative data set according to the Charlson classification was examined in models of 30-day mortality. RESULTS: The positive predictive value (PPV) of a primary diagnosis ICD-9 428 was 94.3% using the Framingham criteria and 88.6% using criteria previously validated with pulmonary capillary wedge pressure. There was reduced prevalence of secondary comorbid conditions in administrative data in comparison with clinical chart data. The specificities and PPV/negative predictive values of administratively identified index comorbidities were high. The sensitivities of index comorbidities were low, but were enhanced by examination of hospitalizations within 1 year prior to the index heart failure admission. Using information from prior hospitalizations modestly enhanced 30-day mortality model performance; however, the odds ratio point estimates of the index and enhanced administrative data sets were consistent with the clinical model. CONCLUSION: The ICD-9 428 primary diagnosis is highly predictive of heart failure using clinical criteria. Examination of hospitalization data up to 1 year prior to the index admission improves comorbidity detection and may provide enhancements to future studies of heart failure mortality.
Authors: Adeel A Butt; Chung-Chou Chang; Lewis Kuller; Matthew Bidwell Goetz; David Leaf; David Rimland; Cynthia L Gibert; Krisann K Oursler; Maria C Rodriguez-Barradas; Joseph Lim; Lewis E Kazis; Stephen Gottlieb; Amy C Justice; Matthew S Freiberg Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2011-04-25
Authors: Jane S Saczynski; Susan E Andrade; Leslie R Harrold; Jennifer Tjia; Sarah L Cutrona; Katherine S Dodd; Robert J Goldberg; Jerry H Gurwitz Journal: Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf Date: 2012-01 Impact factor: 2.890
Authors: Morgan E Grams; Laura C Plantinga; Elizabeth Hedgeman; Rajiv Saran; Gary L Myers; Desmond E Williams; Neil R Powe Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2010-08-06 Impact factor: 8.860
Authors: Daniel G Hackam; Fangyun Wu; Ping Li; Peter C Austin; Sheldon W Tobe; Muhammad M Mamdani; Amit X Garg Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2010-12-14 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Larry A Allen; Marianne Ulcickas Yood; Edward H Wagner; Erin J Aiello Bowles; Roy Pardee; Robert Wellman; Laurel Habel; Larissa Nekhlyudov; Robert L Davis; Adedayo A Onitilo; David J Magid Journal: Med Care Date: 2014-05 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: David N Juurlink; Tara Gomes; Dennis T Ko; Paul E Szmitko; Peter C Austin; Jack V Tu; David A Henry; Alex Kopp; Muhammad M Mamdani Journal: CMAJ Date: 2009-01-28 Impact factor: 8.262
Authors: Tamara P Miller; Andrea B Troxel; Yimei Li; Yuan-Shung Huang; Todd A Alonzo; Robert B Gerbing; Matt Hall; Kari Torp; Brian T Fisher; Rochelle Bagatell; Alix E Seif; Lillian Sung; Alan Gamis; David Rubin; Selina Luger; Richard Aplenc Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2015-03-11 Impact factor: 3.167