Literature DB >> 15655324

Selection of dilutional method for on-line HDF, pre- or post-dilution.

Ikuto Masakane1.   

Abstract

Post- and pre-dilution methods equally have advantages and disadvantages, therefore we should choose the more favorable one for clinical use. However, it still remains controversial which technique is better in on-line HDF. In post-dilution, the clearances of small molecular uremic toxins increase as well as low molecular proteins, however the risk of albumin leakage caused by high transmembranous pressure (TMP) also increases. We can avoid the risk of albumin leakage because there are several maneuvers which aid in avoiding an increase of TMP, such as glucose infusion and gradual control of Q(f). On the other hand, the pre-dilution method is rather safe in the risk of albumin leakage but has an obvious clearance loss of small molecular substances caused by a decreased dialysate flow rate. The influence of microbial contamination and acetate are rather severe in pre-dilution on-line HDF. These lines of evidence suggest that post-dilution on-line HDF is the best choice for treating chronic HD patients. Copyright (c) 2004 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15655324     DOI: 10.1159/000081875

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood Purif        ISSN: 0253-5068            Impact factor:   2.614


  1 in total

1.  Comparison of the effects of predilution and postdilution hemodiafiltration on neutrophils, lymphocytes and platelets.

Authors:  Kenji Sakurai; Takeshi Saito; Fumi Yamauchi; Daiki Asahi; Hiromi Hosoya
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 1.731

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.