Literature DB >> 15655085

Changing research culture.

Igor Svab1.   

Abstract

Although there is general agreement that family medicine has a lot to offer to the health care system, the academic dimension is still not widely understood. There are two main reasons why family medicine needs to develop its scientific potential: to address the true nature of the discipline, and to help in its recognition. The academic establishment benefits from academic family medicine by gaining new questions that are necessary to be answered and by gaining new research approaches.Many problems are encountered when introducing family medicine into the academic arena. Two main strategies for developing family medicine research can be identified. The first is to adapt to the existing structure of the academic world by claiming equal rights with the developed disciplines, collaborating with other university departments in their research projects, publishing articles in established journals, and participating in established faculty development programs. The other, more demanding, strategy is to introduce changes to the academic arena by developing specific research questions, by collaborating on research within family medicine, and by developing family medicine's own success criteria for academic excellence. The two approaches are not mutually exclusive. The World Organization of Family Doctors plays an important role in supporting both approaches through its international affiliations and contacts with policy makers.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15655085      PMCID: PMC1466775          DOI: 10.1370/afm.150

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Fam Med        ISSN: 1544-1709            Impact factor:   5.166


  16 in total

1.  An international course for faculty development in family medicine: the Slovenian model.

Authors:  I Svab; Y Yaphe; J Correia de Sousa; G Passerini
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 6.251

2.  Networks for research in primary health care.

Authors:  P Thomas; F Griffiths; J Kai; A O'Dwyer
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-03-10

3.  Practice based primary care research networks. They work and are ready for full development and support.

Authors:  L A Green; S M Dovey
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-03-10

4.  Independence days.

Authors:  J Oldham; I Rutter
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-03-20

Review 5.  Complexity science: The challenge of complexity in health care.

Authors:  P E Plsek; T Greenhalgh
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-09-15

6.  Linking education, research, and service in general practice.

Authors:  P Wallace; S Drage; N Jackson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-01-31

7.  Primary care research: the MRC's proposals.

Authors:  G Radda
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 5.386

8.  A framework for primary care research.

Authors:  B Starfield
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 0.493

9.  The extent of inter- and intrareviewer agreement on the classification and assessment of designs of single-practice research.

Authors:  F J Meijman; R A de Melker
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 2.267

10.  An inspectorate for the health service?

Authors:  J Oldham
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-10-11
View more
  9 in total

1.  Improving health care globally: a critical review of the necessity of family medicine research and recommendations to build research capacity.

Authors:  Chris van Weel; Walter W Rosser
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2004-05-26       Impact factor: 5.166

2.  International collaboration in primary care: a win-win situation.

Authors:  Teresa Pawlikowska; Hans Thulesius
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 2.581

3.  Residency research requirements and the CanMEDS-FM scholar role: perspectives of residents and recent graduates.

Authors:  Jonathan Koo; Jason Bains; Marisa B Collins; Shafik Dharamsi
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.275

4.  The profile of general practitioners (GPs) who publish in selected family practice journals.

Authors:  J Soler-González; C Ruiz; C Serna; J R Marsal
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2011-05-26

5.  The role of the champion in primary care change efforts: from the State Networks of Colorado Ambulatory Practices and Partners (SNOCAP).

Authors:  Eric K Shaw; Jenna Howard; David R West; Benjamin F Crabtree; Donald E Nease; Brandon Tutt; Paul A Nutting
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2012 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.657

6.  Bursaries, writing grants and fellowships: a strategy to develop research capacity in primary health care.

Authors:  Karin Ried; Elizabeth A Farmer; Kathryn M Weston
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2007-04-05       Impact factor: 2.497

7.  Patient and professional attitudes towards research in general practice: the RepR qualitative study.

Authors:  Jean-Sébastien Cadwallader; Jean-Pierre Lebeau; Evelyne Lasserre; Laurent Letrilliart
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2014-07-21       Impact factor: 2.497

8.  Developing a teaching research culture for general practice registrars in Australia: a literature review.

Authors:  Marjan Kljakovic
Journal:  Asia Pac Fam Med       Date:  2009-06-16

9.  National culture as a correlate of research impact and productivity.

Authors:  Juneman Abraham
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2019-02-28
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.