Literature DB >> 15654709

Interventions used to improve control of blood pressure in patients with hypertension.

T Fahey1, K Schroeder, S Ebrahim.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It is well recognized that patients with high blood pressure (hypertension) in the community frequently fail to meet treatment goals- a condition labeled as "uncontrolled" hypertension. The optimal way in which to organize and deliver care to patients who have hypertension so that they reach treatment goals has not been clearly identified.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the effectiveness of interventions to improve control of blood pressure in patients with elevated blood pressure. To evaluate the ability of reminders to improve the follow-up of patients with elevated blood pressure. SEARCH STRATEGY: All-language search of all articles (any year) in the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (CCTR), Medline and Embase from June 2000. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of patients with hypertension that evaluated the following interventions: (1) self-monitoring (2) educational interventions directed to the patient (3) educational interventions directed to the health professional (4) health professional (nurse or pharmacist) led care (5) organisational interventions that aimed to improve the delivery of care (6) appointment reminder systems. OUTCOMES ASSESSED WERE: (1) mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure (2) control of blood pressure (3) proportion of patients followed up at clinic. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors extracted data independently and in duplicate and assessed each study according to the criteria outlined by the Cochrane Collaboration Handbook. MAIN
RESULTS: 59 RCTs met our inclusion criteria. The methodological quality of included studies was variable. An organized system of regular review linked to vigorous antihypertensive drug therapy was shown to reduce blood pressure (weighted mean difference -8.2/-4.2 mmHg, -11.7/-6.5 mmHg, -10.6/-7.6 mmHg for 3 strata of entry blood pressure) and all-cause mortality at five years follow-up (6.38% versus 7.78%, difference 1.4%) in a single large RCT- the Hypertension Detection and Follow-Up study. Other interventions had variable effects. Self-monitoring was associated with moderate net reduction in diastolic blood pressure (weighted mean difference (WMD): -2.03 mmHg, 95%CI: -2.69 to -1.38 mmHg, respectively. Appointment reminders increased the proportion of individuals who attended for follow-up. RCTs of educational interventions directed at patients or health professionals were heterogeneous but appeared unlikely to be associated with large net reductions in blood pressure by themselves. Health professional (nurse or pharmacist) led care may be a promising way of delivering care, with the majority of RCTs being associated with improved blood pressure control, but requires further evaluation. AUTHORS'
CONCLUSIONS: Family practices and community-based clinics need to have an organized system of regular follow-up and review of their hypertensive patients. Antihypertensive drug therapy should be implemented by means of a systematic stepped care approach when patients do not reach target blood pressure levels.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15654709     DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005182

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev        ISSN: 1361-6137


  19 in total

1.  Self monitoring of high blood pressure.

Authors:  J Carel Bakx; Mark C van der Wel; Chris van Weel
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-09-03

2.  Overcoming clinical inertia in the management of hypertension.

Authors:  Chris Salisbury; Tom Fahey
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2006-04-25       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 3.  Meta-analysis does not allow appraisal of complex interventions in diabetes and hypertension self-management: a methodological review.

Authors:  M Lenz; A Steckelberg; B Richter; I Mühlhauser
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2007-05-23       Impact factor: 10.122

Review 4.  Cardiovascular health disparities: a systematic review of health care interventions.

Authors:  Andrew M Davis; Lisa M Vinci; Tochi M Okwuosa; Ayana R Chase; Elbert S Huang
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.929

Review 5.  Desirable therapeutic characteristics of an optimal antihypertensive agent.

Authors:  Lisa Mustone Alexander
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  Prevalence of blood pressure self-monitoring, medication adherence, self-efficacy, stage of change, and blood pressure control among municipal workers with hypertension.

Authors:  Tonya L Breaux-Shropshire; Kathleen C Brown; Erica R Pryor; Elizabeth H Maples
Journal:  Workplace Health Saf       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.413

Review 7.  Pay for performance: is it the best way to improve control of hypertension?

Authors:  Tim Doran; Catherine Fullwood
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 5.369

8.  Racial differences in two self-management hypertension interventions.

Authors:  Hayden B Bosworth; Maren K Olsen; Janet M Grubber; Benjamin J Powers; Eugene Z Oddone
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.965

Review 9.  Nurse led interventions to improve control of blood pressure in people with hypertension: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Christopher E Clark; Lindsay F P Smith; Rod S Taylor; John L Campbell
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-08-23

10.  The need for nursing instruction in patients receiving steroid pulse therapy for the treatment of autoimmune diseases and the effect of instruction on patient knowledge.

Authors:  Yu-Chu Pai
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-09-21       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.