Literature DB >> 15654211

Powered instrumentation and tissue effects in the nose and paranasal sinuses.

Trevor G Hackman1, Berrylin J Ferguson.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The technologic cornerstones of endoscopic sinus surgery initially rested on the endoscope and CT scanning. In the mid-1990s, the advent of powered instrumentation, in particular the microdebrider, advanced the surgeon's ability to treat polypoid disease, sinus and nasal disease in a bleeding field, choanal atresia, antral choanal polyps, and inferior turbinate hypertrophy. This review evaluates both positive and negative tissue effects secondary to powered instrumentation. RECENT
FINDINGS: Recent reports of deleterious outcomes with powered instrumentation require a reevaluation of the role of powered instrumentation and consideration of factors that lead to injury. The rapidity of injury makes the powered instrument especially dangerous in inexperienced hands. One third of participants in a recent survey were unaware that powered instruments could be involved in orbital injury and half were unaware that cranial injuries could be secondary to powered instrumentation.
SUMMARY: Microdebriders will continue to advance the field of endoscopic surgery, providing clearer operative fields and causing less tissue trauma in experienced hands. However, the severity of complications, including the potential for rapidly aspirating orbital and cerebral contents when laminae are violated, must be appreciated and respected.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15654211     DOI: 10.1097/00020840-200502000-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 1068-9508            Impact factor:   2.064


  9 in total

1.  [Rhinosinusitis guidelines--unabridged version: S2 guidelines from the German Society of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery].

Authors:  B A Stuck; C Bachert; P Federspil; W Hosemann; L Klimek; R Mösges; O Pfaar; C Rudack; H Sitter; M Wagenmann; R Weber; K Hörmann
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 2.  Comprehensive review on endonasal endoscopic sinus surgery.

Authors:  Rainer K Weber; Werner Hosemann
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2015-12-22

Review 3.  Risks and medico-legal aspects of endoscopic sinus surgery: a review.

Authors:  M Re; G Magliulo; R Romeo; F M Gioacchini; E Pasquini
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  [Rhinosinusitis guidelines of the German Society for Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery].

Authors:  B A Stuck; C Bachert; P Federspil; W Hosemann; L Klimek; R Mösges; O Pfaar; C Rudack; H Sitter; M Wagenmann; K Hörmann
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 5.  Danger points, complications and medico-legal aspects in endoscopic sinus surgery.

Authors:  W Hosemann; C Draf
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2013-12-13

6.  Modeling Microdebrider-Mediated Ophthalmic Damage: A Word of Caution in Endoscopic Sinus Surgery.

Authors:  Cameron P Worden; Carly A Clark; Anna K Senior; Rodney J Schlosser; Adam J Kimple; Brent A Senior
Journal:  Rhinol Online       Date:  2019-03-07

7.  Complications of vision loss and ophthalmoplegia during endoscopic sinus surgery.

Authors:  Idit Maharshak; Jenny K Hoang; M Tariq Bhatti
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-03-20

8.  Uncinectomy: Stammberger or swing-door technique?

Authors:  Vishwanath Puranik; Amir El-Sheikha
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2007-05-22       Impact factor: 3.236

9.  Comparison by objective parameters in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis managed medically and surgically (with and without powered instruments).

Authors:  Samarendra Behera; Satyawati Mohindra; Sourabha K Patro; Ashok K Gupta
Journal:  Allergy Rhinol (Providence)       Date:  2016-01-01
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.