Literature DB >> 15654098

Infrequent co-conversion of markers flanking a meiotic recombination initiation site in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Lea Jessop1, Thorsten Allers, Michael Lichten.   

Abstract

To study the mechanism of meiotic recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, we examined recombination in an interval where the majority of events are initiated at a single hotspot for DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), with little or no expected contribution by outside initiation events. This interval contained infrequently corrected palindromic markers 300 bp to the left and 600 bp to the right of the DSB hotspot. Conversion of single markers occurred frequently, while conversion of both markers occurred rarely, and many of the tetrads in which both markers converted were the products of multiple events. These data indicate that most meiotic recombination intermediates are asymmetrically positioned around the initiating DSB, with a short (<300 bp) tract of heteroduplex DNA (hDNA) to one side and hDNA on the other side frequently extending 600 bp or more. One consequence of this asymmetry is the preferential concentration of crossovers in the vicinity of the initiating DSB.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15654098      PMCID: PMC1449552          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.104.036509

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  45 in total

Review 1.  Homologous recombination near and far from DNA breaks: alternative roles and contrasting views.

Authors:  G R Smith
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 16.830

2.  Differential timing and control of noncrossover and crossover recombination during meiosis.

Authors:  T Allers; M Lichten
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2001-07-13       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  Intermediates of yeast meiotic recombination contain heteroduplex DNA.

Authors:  T Allers; M Lichten
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 17.970

4.  Polo-like kinase Cdc5 promotes chiasmata formation and cosegregation of sister centromeres at meiosis I.

Authors:  Rosemary K Clyne; Vittorio L Katis; Lea Jessop; Kirsten R Benjamin; Ira Herskowitz; Michael Lichten; Kim Nasmyth
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 28.824

Review 5.  Un ménage à quatre: the molecular biology of chromosome segregation in meiosis.

Authors:  Mark Petronczki; Maria F Siomos; Kim Nasmyth
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2003-02-21       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  Trans events associated with crossovers are revealed in the absence of mismatch repair genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Eva R Hoffmann; Rhona H Borts
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-01-16       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Meiotic recombination frequencies are affected by nutritional states in Saccharomycescerevisiae.

Authors:  M F Abdullah; R H Borts
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-11-27       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Meiotic recombination remote from prominent DNA break sites in S. pombe.

Authors:  Jennifer A Young; Randall W Schreckhise; Walter W Steiner; Gerald R Smith
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 17.970

9.  The mechanism of Mus81-Mms4 cleavage site selection distinguishes it from the homologous endonuclease Rad1-Rad10.

Authors:  Suzanne A Bastin-Shanower; William M Fricke; Janet R Mullen; Steven J Brill
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.272

10.  Patterns of heteroduplex formation associated with the initiation of meiotic recombination in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Jason D Merker; Margaret Dominska; Thomas D Petes
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  47 in total

1.  High-Resolution Global Analysis of the Influences of Bas1 and Ino4 Transcription Factors on Meiotic DNA Break Distributions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Xuan Zhu; Scott Keeney
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Meiotic recombination-related DNA synthesis and its implications for cross-over and non-cross-over recombinant formation.

Authors:  Masahiro Terasawa; Hideyuki Ogawa; Yasumasa Tsukamoto; Miki Shinohara; Katsuhiko Shirahige; Nancy Kleckner; Tomoko Ogawa
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-03-23       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Analysis of one-sided marker segregation patterns resulting from mammalian gene targeting.

Authors:  Richard D McCulloch; Mark D Baker
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 4.  The template choice decision in meiosis: is the sister important?

Authors:  Mónica Pradillo; Juan L Santos
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2011-08-09       Impact factor: 4.316

5.  Mitotic Gene Conversion Tracts Associated with Repair of a Defined Double-Strand Break in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Yee Fang Hum; Sue Jinks-Robertson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 6.  New Solutions to Old Problems: Molecular Mechanisms of Meiotic Crossover Control.

Authors:  Gerald R Smith; Mridula Nambiar
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2020-03-21       Impact factor: 11.639

7.  Reduced mismatch repair of heteroduplexes reveals "non"-interfering crossing over in wild-type Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Tony J Getz; Stephen A Banse; Lisa S Young; Allison V Banse; Johanna Swanson; Grace M Wang; Barclay L Browne; Henriette M Foss; Franklin W Stahl
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Double Holliday junctions are intermediates of DNA break repair.

Authors:  Malgorzata Bzymek; Nathaniel H Thayer; Steve D Oh; Nancy Kleckner; Neil Hunter
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-03-28       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Frequent and efficient use of the sister chromatid for DNA double-strand break repair during budding yeast meiosis.

Authors:  Tamara Goldfarb; Michael Lichten
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  Trying to avoid your sister.

Authors:  Jessica P Lao; Neil Hunter
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 8.029

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.