Literature DB >> 15653295

Source analysis of the N2 in a cued Go/NoGo task.

Evelijne M Bekker1, J Leon Kenemans, Marinus N Verbaten.   

Abstract

Previous source analyses of event-related potential (ERP) data elicited in Go/NoGo tasks have suggested that the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) plays an important role in response inhibition. So far, however, source models were derived for the difference wave Go stimulus minus NoGo stimulus. This difference wave is confounded with motor- and attention-related activity. To avoid these confounds, we alternatively derived source models for NoGo stimuli only. The problem of the NoGo-N2 being superimposed on a positive deflection was addressed in two ways. First, a baseline correction was applied using the time points just preceding and succeeding the NoGo-N2. Second, a separate source model was derived at the maximum amplitude of this positive deflection. Subjects were presented with a cued version of the continuous performance task (CPT; ABX). In a second study, the probability of the Go stimulus was gradually increased to heighten subjects' tendency to respond and, as a consequence, to enhance the amplitude of the NoGo-N2. The source models of the NoGo-N2 consistently indicated bilateral dipole pairs in medial frontal regions. This is in accordance with a generator in the anterior cingulate cortex.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15653295     DOI: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.08.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res        ISSN: 0926-6410


  68 in total

1.  Neurocognitive deficits in male alcoholics: an ERP/sLORETA analysis of the N2 component in an equal probability Go/NoGo task.

Authors:  A K Pandey; C Kamarajan; Y Tang; D B Chorlian; B N Roopesh; N Manz; A Stimus; M Rangaswamy; B Porjesz
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2011-10-21       Impact factor: 3.251

2.  Beneficial effects of electrostimulation contingencies on sustained attention and electrocortical activity.

Authors:  Max Jean-Lon Chen; Trevor Thompson; Juri Kropotov; John H Gruzelier
Journal:  CNS Neurosci Ther       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 5.243

Review 3.  How human electrophysiology informs psychopharmacology: from bottom-up driven processing to top-down control.

Authors:  J Leon Kenemans; Seppo Kähkönen
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 7.853

4.  Neural Correlates of Response Inhibition in Adolescents Prospectively Predict Regular Tobacco Smoking.

Authors:  Andrey P Anokhin; Simon Golosheykin
Journal:  Dev Neuropsychol       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.253

5.  Error-likelihood prediction in the medial frontal cortex: a critical evaluation.

Authors:  Sander Nieuwenhuis; Tanja Sophie Schweizer; Rogier B Mars; Matthew M Botvinick; Greg Hajcak
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2006-09-06       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 6.  Attentional orienting and response inhibition: insights from spatial-temporal neuroimaging.

Authors:  Yin Tian; Shanshan Liang; Dezhong Yao
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2013-08-03       Impact factor: 5.203

7.  Neurophysiological markers that predict and track treatment outcomes in childhood anxiety.

Authors:  Kathryn M Hum; Katharina Manassis; Marc D Lewis
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  2013-11

8.  The role of the cingulate cortex as neural generator of the N200 and P300 in a tactile response inhibition task.

Authors:  R J Huster; R Westerhausen; C Pantev; C Konrad
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  Classification of ADHD patients on the basis of independent ERP components using a machine learning system.

Authors:  Gian Candrian; Juri D Kropotov; Valery A Ponomarev; Gian-Marco Baschera; Andreas Mueller
Journal:  Nonlinear Biomed Phys       Date:  2010-06-03

10.  A no-go related prefrontal negativity larger to irrelevant stimuli that are difficult to suppress.

Authors:  Alice M Proverbio; Marzia Del Zotto; Nicola Crotti; Alberto Zani
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2009-06-25       Impact factor: 3.759

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.