Literature DB >> 15653289

Mental state inference using visual control parameters.

Erhan Oztop1, Daniel Wolpert, Mitsuo Kawato.   

Abstract

Although we can often infer the mental states of others by observing their actions, there are currently no computational models of this remarkable ability. Here we develop a computational model of mental state inference that builds upon a generic visuomanual feedback controller, and implements mental simulation and mental state inference functions using circuitry that subserves sensorimotor control. Our goal is (1) to show that control mechanisms developed for manual manipulation are readily endowed with visual and predictive processing capabilities and thus allows a natural extension to the understanding of movements performed by others; and (2) to give an explanation on how cortical regions, in particular the parietal and premotor cortices, may be involved in such dual mechanism. To analyze the model, we simulate tasks in which an observer watches an actor performing either a reaching or a grasping movement. The observer's goal is to estimate the 'mental state' of the actor: the goal of the reaching movement or the intention of the agent performing the grasping movement. We show that the motor modules of the observer can be used in a 'simulation mode' to infer the mental state of the actor. The simulations with different grasping and non-straight line reaching strategies show that the mental state inference model is applicable to complex movements. Moreover, we simulate deceptive reaching, where an actor imposes false beliefs about his own mental state on an observer. The simulations show that computational elements developed for sensorimotor control are effective in inferring the mental states of others. The parallels between the model and cortical organization of movement suggest that primates might have developed a similar resource utilization strategy for action understanding, and thus lead to testable predictions about the brain mechanisms of mental state inference.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15653289     DOI: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.08.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res        ISSN: 0926-6410


  30 in total

Review 1.  Principles of sensorimotor learning.

Authors:  Daniel M Wolpert; Jörn Diedrichsen; J Randall Flanagan
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 34.870

2.  Embodied cognitive evolution and the cerebellum.

Authors:  Robert A Barton
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-08-05       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Inference of complex human motion requires internal models of action: behavioral evidence.

Authors:  Ghislain Saunier; Charalambos Papaxanthis; Claudia D Vargas; Thierry Pozzo
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-10-23       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Brain mechanisms for predictive control by switching internal models: implications for higher-order cognitive functions.

Authors:  Hiroshi Imamizu; Mitsuo Kawato
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2009-04-04

5.  Thinking as the control of imagination: a conceptual framework for goal-directed systems.

Authors:  Giovanni Pezzulo; Cristiano Castelfranchi
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2009-04-04

6.  Information processing in the mirror neuron system in primates and machines.

Authors:  Yiannis Demiris; Lisa Aziz-Zadeh; James Bonaiuto
Journal:  Neuroinformatics       Date:  2014-01

7.  Action and language mechanisms in the brain: data, models and neuroinformatics.

Authors:  Michael A Arbib; James J Bonaiuto; Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky; David Kemmerer; Brian MacWhinney; Finn Årup Nielsen; Erhan Oztop
Journal:  Neuroinformatics       Date:  2014-01

8.  The role of observers' gaze behaviour when watching object manipulation tasks: predicting and evaluating the consequences of action.

Authors:  J Randall Flanagan; Gerben Rotman; Andreas F Reichelt; Roland S Johansson
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Prediction of human actions: expertise and task-related effects on neural activation of the action observation network.

Authors:  Nils Balser; Britta Lorey; Sebastian Pilgramm; Rudolf Stark; Matthias Bischoff; Karen Zentgraf; Andrew Mark Williams; Jörn Munzert
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 5.038

10.  Intentional communication: computationally easy or difficult?

Authors:  Iris van Rooij; Johan Kwisthout; Mark Blokpoel; Jakub Szymanik; Todd Wareham; Ivan Toni
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.