Literature DB >> 15652824

Evaluation of image artifact produced by optical coherence tomography of retinal pathology.

Robin Ray1, Sandra S Stinnett, Glenn J Jaffe.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the frequency and type of optical coherence tomography (OCT) fast macular thickness map (FMTM) scan artifacts, and whether these artifacts depend on patient diagnosis, demographics, and ocular therapy.
DESIGN: Retrospective observational case series.
METHODS: Records from patients who underwent an ophthalmologic evaluation by a member of the Duke University Eye Center vitreoretinal faculty and had an OCT scan produced by the FMTM protocol between July 7, 2003 and July 31, 2003 were reviewed. The relationships between OCT scan artifacts and ocular diagnosis, ocular treatment, and patient demographics were determined. Logistic regression was used to relate OCT scan artifacts simultaneously with ocular diagnosis and treatment.
RESULTS: Scans from 171 eyes were analyzed. Retinal scan artifacts, though not observed in normal eyes, were identified frequently in eyes with macular pathology (P = .049). Artifacts were observed in 43.2% of all scans, and of these, an erroneous retinal thickness measurement was obtained in 62.2%. Six types of OCT surface map artifacts were observed. Of these, inner and outer retinal misidentification, degraded image artifact, and "off center" artifact were significantly associated with central thickness calculation errors (P < .001). Neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD), full-thickness macular hole, and photodynamic therapy were all associated with increased artifact (P = .002, .022, and <.001, respectively).
CONCLUSION: Optical coherence tomography scan artifacts are seen surprisingly frequently, adversely affect retinal thickness measurements in a high proportion of cases, and are diagnosis-dependent. Recognition of these artifacts will improve retinal thickness measurement accuracy, and will prevent faulty treatment decisions that are based on inaccurate retinal thickness measurements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15652824     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2004.07.050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0002-9394            Impact factor:   5.258


  58 in total

1.  Optical coherence tomography analysis of a randomized study combining photodynamic therapy with intravitreal triamcinolone.

Authors:  L Arias; J Garcia-Arumi; J M Ramon; M Badia; M Rubio; O Pujol
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-08-03       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Diurnal variation in retinal thickening measurement by optical coherence tomography in center-involved diabetic macular edema.

Authors:  Ronald P Danis; Adam R Glassman; Lloyd Paul Aiello; Andrew N Antoszyk; Roy W Beck; David J Browning; Antonio P Ciardella; James L Kinyoun; Timothy J Murtha; Trexler M Topping; Michel Shami; George S Sharuk; John A Wells
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-12

3.  Macular thickness after uneventful cataract surgery determined by optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Burkhard von Jagow; Christian Ohrloff; Thomas Kohnen
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-07-10       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 4.  Role of optic nerve imaging in glaucoma clinical practice and clinical trials.

Authors:  David S Greenfield; Robert N Weinreb
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 5.258

5.  New algorithm to analyze optical coherence tomographic images quantitatively.

Authors:  Kohei Ishikawa; Yasuki Ito; Ryuji Mizutani; Masato Kikuchi; Hiroaki Nishihara; Hiroko Terasaki
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-07-27       Impact factor: 2.447

6.  Reliability and reproducibility of macular segmentation using a custom-built optical coherence tomography retinal image analysis software.

Authors:  Delia Cabrera DeBuc; Gábor Márk Somfai; Sudarshan Ranganathan; Erika Tátrai; Mária Ferencz; Carmen A Puliafito
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2009 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.170

7.  Comparison of optical coherence tomography in diabetic macular edema, with and without reading center manual grading from a clinical trials perspective.

Authors:  Adam R Glassman; Roy W Beck; David J Browning; Ronald P Danis; Craig Kollman
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2008-06-19       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Relationship between angiographic and optical coherence tomographic (OCT) parameters for quantifying choroidal neovascular lesions.

Authors:  Srinivas R Sadda; Sandra Liakopoulos; Pearse A Keane; Sharel C Ongchin; Sandeep Msutta; Karen T Chang; Alexander C Walsh
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-09-17       Impact factor: 3.117

9.  The Standard Care vs Corticosteroid for Retinal Vein Occlusion (SCORE) study system for evaluation of optical coherence tomograms: SCORE study report 4.

Authors:  Amitha Domalpally; Barbara A Blodi; Ingrid U Scott; Michael S Ip; Neal L Oden; Andreas K Lauer; Paul C VanVeldhuisen
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-11

10.  Comparison of spectral/Fourier domain optical coherence tomography instruments for assessment of normal macular thickness.

Authors:  Alan C Sull; Laurel N Vuong; Lori Lyn Price; Vivek J Srinivasan; Iwona Gorczynska; James G Fujimoto; Joel S Schuman; Jay S Duker
Journal:  Retina       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.256

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.