Literature DB >> 15652608

Human polymicrobial infections.

Kim A Brogden1, Janet M Guthmiller, Christopher E Taylor.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Polymicrobial diseases, caused by combinations of viruses, bacteria, fungi, and parasites, are being recognised with increasing frequency. In these infections, the presence of one micro-organism generates a niche for other pathogenic micro-organisms to colonise, one micro-organism predisposes the host to colonisation by other micro-organisms, or two or more non-pathogenic micro-organisms together cause disease. STARTING POINT: Recently, Gili Regev-Yochay (JAMA 2004; 292: 716-20) and Debby Bogaert (Lancet 2004; 363: 1871-72), and their colleagues, suggested another interaction: microbial interference-the ability of Streptococcus pneumoniae carriage to protect against Staphylococcus aureus carriage, and the inverse effect of pneumococcal conjugate vaccination on the increased carriage of Staph aureus and Staph-aureus-related disease. Strep pneumoniae carriage protected against Staph aureus carriage, and the bacterial interference could be disrupted by vaccinating children with pneumococcal conjugate vaccines that reduced nasopharyngeal carriage of vaccine-type Strep pneumoniae. WHERE NEXT: The medical community is recognising the significance of polymicrobial diseases and the major types of microbial community interactions associated with human health and disease. Many traditional therapies are just starting to take into account the polymicrobial cause of diseases and the repercussions of treatment and prevention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15652608      PMCID: PMC7119324          DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)17745-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


Polymicrobial diseases, which are recognised with increasing frequency, are acute and chronic diseases caused by various combinations of viruses, bacteria, fungi, and parasites. Generally the presence of one micro-organism generates a niche for other pathogenic micro-organisms to colonise, the presence of one micro-organism predisposes the host to colonisation by other micro-organisms, or two or more non-pathogenic micro-organisms together cause disease (table ). These concepts sparked interest at a conference sponsored by the American Society for Microbiology (Oct 19–23, 2003, Lake Tahoe, Nevada).
Table

Combinations of micro-organisms in human polymicrobial diseases

Causal agentsDisease
Synergistic polymicrobial infections
Human metapneumovirus with coronavirus or respiratory syncytial virusSARS, bronchiolitis2, 3, 4
Measles and Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Staphylococcus aureusMeasles5
Epstein-Barr virus and retrovirusMultiple sclerosis9
HTLV-I, HTLV-II, and/or HIV-1, HIV-2AIDS30
HTLV-I and HTLV-IIRespiratory and urinary tract infections7
HIV and M tuberculosisAIDS8
HBV or HCV and HIV-1AIDS31
HIV and enteric viruses, Acinetobacter radioresistens, M tuberculosis, Ehrlichia chaffeensis, Candida albicans, Histoplasma capsulatum, Cryptosporidium parvum, Trichomonas vaginalis, and othersAIDS
Lyme disease with babesiosis or ehrlichiosisLyme disease
Stenotrophomonas maltophilia and Aspergillus fumigatusCorneal infection
Infections predisposing to polymicrobial disease
Influenza viruses, parainfluenza viruses, respiratory syncytial viruses, adenoviruses, measles viruses, rhinoviruses, and coronaviruses with Streptococcus pneumoniae, Strep pyogenes, Haemophilus influenzae, Staph aureus, Neisseria meningitidis, M tuberculosis, or Bordetella pertussisRespiratory disease10
Coronavirus and Escherichia coliSARS
Respiratory tract viruses and bacterial infectionsOtitis media11, 12
Varicella-zoster virus and Strep pyogenesInvasive group A streptococcal disease32
Additive polymicrobial infections
Aerobic and anaerobic gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria and Candida sppPeriodontal disease33
Prevotella-like bacteriaCaries
B pertussis, Strep pneumoniae, Staph aureus, H influenzaePertussis34
Nocardia asteroides and Cryptococcus neoformansLung abscesses
Herpes zoster and tuberculosisTuberculosis
Pseudomonas aeruginosa, S maltophilia, Prevotella oris, Fusobacterium gonidoformans, Bacteroides fragilis, Leptotrichia-like spp, Abiotrophia defecta, Citrobacter murliniae, Lautropia mirabilis, and Sarcina ventriculiCystic fibrosis25
Aerobic and anaerobic gram-positive and gram-negative bacteriaPeritonitis13
HBV, HCV, and HDVHepatitis14, 15
HCV and HIVHepatitis14, 15
Norwalk-like virus and Aeromonas sobria or E coliGastroenteritis
Schistosoma haematobium and S mansoniIntestinal schistosomiasis
Combinations of Corynebacterium urealyticum, Gardnerella vaginalis, Anaerococcus lactolyticus, Bact vulgatus, Dialister invisus, Fusobacterium nucleatum, Lactobacillus iners, Leptotrichia amnionii, P buccalis, P ruminicola, Rahnella aquatilis, and Strep intermediusUrinary tract infection
Staphylcoccus spp, Streptococcus spp, and HACEK groupEndocarditis
Microbial interference
Flavivirus and HIVAIDS19
Strep pneumoniae and Staph aureusStaph-aureus-related disease20, 21

SARS=severe acute respiratory syndrome, HACEK=Haemophilus spp, Actinobacillus spp, Cardiobacterium hominis, Eikenella corrodens, and Kingella kingae.

Combinations of micro-organisms in human polymicrobial diseases SARS=severe acute respiratory syndrome, HACEK=Haemophilus spp, Actinobacillus spp, Cardiobacterium hominis, Eikenella corrodens, and Kingella kingae. Polymicrobial infections also include an interaction called microbial interference: the presence of one micro-organism generates a niche in the host that suppresses the colonisation of other micro-organisms. Microbial interference can occur between potential pathogens or between probiotic organisms and pathogens. In synergistic polymicrobial infections, one micro-organism generates a niche favourable for the infection and colonisation of other, often pathogenic micro-organisms, similar to the metabolic interdependancies seen between some periodontal pathogens or the infections resulting from virus-induced immunosuppression. Human metapneumovirus, for example, has been isolated with coronavirus in patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome and also with respiratory syncytial virus in bronchiolitis and other respiratory infections. Measles virus kills mainly because of secondary infections induced by immunosuppression, and an immunosuppressive factor produced by infected lymphoid cells might profoundly inhibit B-cell proliferation. Patients with human T-lymphotropic virus type I (HTLV-I) had increased incidences of bladder and kidney infection, and patients with HTLV-II had increased incidences of acute bronchitis, bladder and kidney infection, arthritis, and asthma. Many HIV-AIDS patients in Africa are also co-infected with malaria parasites or with Mycobacterium tuberculosis, and with other viruses, bacteria, fungi, and protozoans. The role of Epstein-Barr virus and retrovirus resulting in multiple sclerosis is still to be determined. The presence of one micro-organism can predispose the host to colonisation or infection by a second organism, often consecutively. Respiratory tract viruses destroy respiratory epithelium (increasing bacterial adhesion), induce immunosuppression causing bacterial superinfections, or upregulate the expression of molecules that bacteria use as receptors. Specific viruses and bacteria involved in these infections are shown in the table. Respiratory tract viruses also have a pivotal role in predisposing the middle ear to bacterial infections resulting in otitis media.11, 12 In additive polymicrobial infections, two or more non-pathogenic micro-organisms together can cause bacteraemia, abdominal abscess or secondary peritonitis, lung abscess, odontogenic infections, brain abscess or subdural empyema, chronic otitis media or mastoiditis, liver infections,14, 15 and soft-tissue infection or fasciitis. Many of these polymicrobial interactions occur within biofilms that form on natural or artificial surfaces within the human host. For example, Pseudomonas aeruginosa has multiple phenotypes during biofilm development. On average, over 525 proteins changed between each of the stages of biofilm development. Understanding the physical and chemical interactions between micro-organisms in these polymicrobial communities will help to define potential new targets for disrupting biofilm-community development and, in cystic fibrosis, affect the ecology of biofilms in the airways of patients. In microbial interference, pathogens or probiotic organisms generate a niche (or occupy sites) in the host that suppresses the colonisation of other micro-organisms. Examples include both viruses and bacteria. GB virus C, a flavivirus which is not known to be pathogenic in human beings, replicates in lymphocytes, inhibits the replication of HIV in vitro, and is associated with a decreased risk of death in HIV-positive people. HIV-infected individuals co-infected with GB virus C had lower mortality rates, higher baseline CD4+ T-cell numbers, a slower rate of decline of CD+ T cells, and lower plasma HIV RNA levels than HIV-positive individuals without GB virus C. Two recent studies show that the carriage of Streptococcus pneumoniae suppresses the carriage of Staphylococcus aureus in vaccinated and unvaccinated healthy children.20, 21 Strep pneumoniae and Staph aureus colonise the upper respiratory tract of children, although not at the same rates of carriage and not necessarily at the same time. This inverse relation suggests that one organism interferes with the colonisation of the other, and the mechanisms may be similar to that reported for bacterial interference by Corynebacterium spp and viridans group streptococci against Staph aureus in the nasal cavity. Gili Regev-Yochay and colleagues recently assessed the possible association between Strep pneumoniae and Staph aureus by studying prevalence and risk factors for carriage in 790 children aged 5 days to 40 months. The carriage rate of Staph aureus was lower in children with Strep pneumoniae (6·5%) than in children without (12·9%), and the carriage rate of Strep pneumoniae was seen to be lower in children with Staph aureus (27·5%) than in children without (44·8%). In children aged 3 months or below, the highest carriage rate of Staph aureus (30%) coincided with the lowest carriage rate of Strep pneumoniae (9%). Similarly, in children aged 7–40 months, the highest carriage rate of Strep pneumoniae (50%) coincided with the lowest carriage rate of Staph aureus (5–9%). Debby Bogaert and colleagues also find a negative correlation between co-colonisation of vaccine type Strep pneumoniae and Staph aureus in 3085 healthy children. Co-colonisation with Staph aureus was lower with vaccine-type Strep pneumoniae (23%) than with the non-vaccine-type (37%) or in children without Strep pneumoniae (37%). Risk factors correlating with an increase in the carriage rate of Strep pneumoniae were age (>3 months), having young siblings, attending day care, having a respiratory tract infection at screening, previous steroid treatment, passive and active smoking, and sporting and social activities.20, 21 Overall, these results suggest that Strep pneumoniae carriage protects against Staph aureus carriage, and the mechanism of bacterial interference could be disrupted by vaccinating children with pneumococcal conjugate vaccines that reduce nasopharyngeal carriage of vaccine-type Strep pneumoniae. This could result in a shift towards their carriage of non-vaccine Strep pneumoniae serotypes or towards higher carriage rates of Staph aureus, including meticillin-resistant Staph aureus.

Novel methods of diagnosis and treatment

Recent technological advances have enhanced the identification and characterisation of the vast microbial diversity colonising the human body (commensals and pathogens). Metagenomic analyses are being used to describe polymicrobial ecosystems, flowcells are being used to study microbial interactions in biofilms, and other molecular methods are being used to identify unique microbial species and phylotypes in complex ecosystems24, 25. However, many of these techniques have not yet reached laboratories in a scale to assist clinicians in practice. Traditional therapies are generally targeted at individual causative agents without consideration for effect on a polymicrobial cause or on individual members of microbial communities. In some cases, there are beneficial consequences. In Africa, HIV infection is concentrated in patients with tuberculosis. Antiretroviral drugs reduce the incidence of tuberculosis to that observed immediately after HIV seroconversion. In other cases, broad-spectrum antibiotics may kill polymicrobial anaerobic flora and reduce colonisation resistance of the intestinal tract, particularly for acquisition of multiresistant bacteria such as vancomycin-resistant enterococci. Probiotics also use microbial interference as a mechanism for novel prophylactic or therapeutic management of polymicrobial diseases. Treatment of patients with Saccharomyces boulardii, lactobacilli, or enterococci prevents or reduces the duration of gastroenteritis caused by bacteria and rotaviruses, and treatment with other lactobacilli, such as L fermentum, L rhamnosus, or L crispatus, has the potential to reduce vaginal infections. The medical community is recognising the significance of polymicrobial diseases and the major types of microbial community interactions associated with human health and disease. Many traditional therapies are just starting to take into account the polymicrobial cause of diseases and the repercussions of treatment and prevention. The use of vaccines to control Strep pneumoniae infection in healthy children may have adverse effects. Regev-Yochay and colleagues suggest that the mechanism of bacterial interference by Strep pneumoniae carriage on Staph aureus carriage could be disrupted by vaccinating children with pneumococcal conjugate vaccines that reduce nasopharyngeal carriage of vaccine-type Strep pneumoniae. Bogaert and colleagues suggest that children vaccinated with a 7 valent pneumococcal-conjugate vaccine became colonised with non-vaccine Strep pneumoniae serotypes and had higher rates of Staph-aureus-related acute otitis media after vaccination. Both conclude that more work is needed to ascertain the potential effects of pneumococcal conjugate vaccination on both Staph aureus carriage and the development of Staph-aureus-related disease.
  32 in total

Review 1.  Necrotizing soft-tissue infections.

Authors:  R A Fontes; C M Ogilvie; T Miclau
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2000 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.020

Review 2.  Effects of antibiotics on nosocomial epidemiology of vancomycin-resistant enterococci.

Authors:  Stephan Harbarth; Sara Cosgrove; Yehuda Carmeli
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  H(2)O(2) produced by viridans group streptococci may contribute to inhibition of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization of oral cavities in newborns.

Authors:  Y Uehara; K Kikuchi; T Nakamura; H Nakama; K Agematsu; Y Kawakami; N Maruchi; K Totsuka
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2001-04-17       Impact factor: 9.079

4.  Piracy of adhesins: attachment of superinfecting pathogens to respiratory cilia by secreted adhesins of Bordetella pertussis.

Authors:  E Tuomanen
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 3.441

5.  Bacterial interference among nasal inhabitants: eradication of Staphylococcus aureus from nasal cavities by artificial implantation of Corynebacterium sp.

Authors:  Y Uehara; H Nakama; K Agematsu; M Uchida; Y Kawakami; A S Abdul Fattah; N Maruchi
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.926

6.  Mutualism versus independence: strategies of mixed-species oral biofilms in vitro using saliva as the sole nutrient source.

Authors:  R J Palmer; K Kazmerzak; M C Hansen; P E Kolenbrander
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.441

7.  Spontaneous production of C-C chemokines by individuals infected with human T lymphotropic virus type II (HTLV-II) alone and HTLV-II/HIV-1 coinfected individuals.

Authors:  M J Lewis; V W Gautier; X P Wang; M H Kaplan; W W Hall
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2000-10-01       Impact factor: 5.422

8.  DNA fingerprinting of Lactobacillus crispatus strain CTV-05 by repetitive element sequence-based PCR analysis in a pilot study of vaginal colonization.

Authors:  May A D Antonio; Sharon L Hillier
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 9.  Probiotics in prevention of antibiotic associated diarrhoea: meta-analysis.

Authors:  Aloysius L D'Souza; Chakravarthi Rajkumar; Jonathan Cooke; Christopher J Bulpitt
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-06-08

10.  Association between carriage of Streptococcus pneumoniae and Staphylococcus aureus in Children.

Authors:  Gili Regev-Yochay; Ron Dagan; Meir Raz; Yehuda Carmeli; Bracha Shainberg; Estela Derazne; Galia Rahav; Ethan Rubinstein
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-08-11       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  138 in total

Review 1.  Organotypic 3D cell culture models: using the rotating wall vessel to study host-pathogen interactions.

Authors:  Jennifer Barrila; Andrea L Radtke; Aurélie Crabbé; Shameema F Sarker; Melissa M Herbst-Kralovetz; C Mark Ott; Cheryl A Nickerson
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 60.633

Review 2.  Future trends and challenges in pathogenomics. A Foresight study.

Authors:  Sven Pompe; Judith Simon; Peter M Wiedemann; Christof Tannert
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 8.807

3.  Polymicrobial infection and the eye.

Authors:  S Tuft
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  Fusobacterium nucleatum transports noninvasive Streptococcus cristatus into human epithelial cells.

Authors:  Andrew M Edwards; Tracy J Grossman; Joel D Rudney
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.441

Review 5.  Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pneumoniae interaction and response to pneumococcal vaccination: Myth or reality?

Authors:  Aylana Reiss-Mandel; Gili Regev-Yochay
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Differential response of Streptococcus mutans towards friend and foe in mixed-species cultures.

Authors:  Jinman Liu; Chenggang Wu; I-Hsiu Huang; Justin Merritt; Fengxia Qi
Journal:  Microbiology (Reading)       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 2.777

7.  Quantifying the consequences of measles-induced immune modulation for whooping cough epidemiology.

Authors:  Navideh Noori; Pejman Rohani
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Porphyromonas gingivalis and Treponema denticola Mixed Microbial Infection in a Rat Model of Periodontal Disease.

Authors:  Raj K Verma; Sunethra Rajapakse; Archana Meka; Clayton Hamrick; Sheela Pola; Indraneel Bhattacharyya; Madhu Nair; Shannon M Wallet; Ikramuddin Aukhil; Lakshmyya Kesavalu
Journal:  Interdiscip Perspect Infect Dis       Date:  2010-05-31

9.  Staphylococcus aureus sigma B-dependent emergence of small-colony variants and biofilm production following exposure to Pseudomonas aeruginosa 4-hydroxy-2-heptylquinoline-N-oxide.

Authors:  Gabriel Mitchell; David Lalonde Séguin; Ann-Elise Asselin; Eric Déziel; André M Cantin; Eric H Frost; Sophie Michaud; François Malouin
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2010-01-30       Impact factor: 3.605

10.  Mixed infections and In Vivo evolution in the human fungal pathogen Cryptococcus neoformans.

Authors:  Marie Desnos-Ollivier; Sweta Patel; Adam R Spaulding; Caroline Charlier; Dea Garcia-Hermoso; Kirsten Nielsen; Françoise Dromer
Journal:  MBio       Date:  2010-05-18       Impact factor: 7.867

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.