Literature DB >> 15652578

Differential distribution of leaf chemistry in eucalypt seedlings due to variation in whole-plant nutrient availability.

Dugald C Close1, Clare McArthur, Ann E Hagerman, Hugh Fitzgerald.   

Abstract

We investigated the effects of whole-plant nutrient-availability on the degree of distribution of some plant primary and secondary (nitrogen, fibre, flavonols, gallotannins and cineole) chemicals across young, mature and old leaves of seedlings of Eucalyptus nitens. Four treatments that ranged from low to high nutrient-application rates resulted in mean whole-plant foliar concentrations of 0.63%, 0.85%, 1.11% and 1.82% nitrogen dry matter (N%DM) for treatments A, B, C and D, respectively. Within-plant distribution (across the leaf age profile of young, mature and old leaves within a eucalypt seedling) of N%DM ranged from zero in treatment A to a wide range of distribution in treatment D (low N%DM concentrations in old leaves to high N%DM concentrations in young leaves). Similarly, the distribution of fibre ranged from zero in treatment A to a wide range of distribution in treatment D, but with high concentrations in old leaves and low concentrations in young leaves. In contrast, flavonols (weakly) and gallotannins had a wide range of distribution in treatment A (low concentrations in old leaves to high concentrations in young leaves) but were little or not distributed in the other treatments. Again in contrast, cineole was strongly distributed between old and young leaves (low concentrations in old leaves to high concentrations in young leaves) across all treatments while concentrations in mature leaves reflected one or other leaf age depending on treatment. Protein precipitable phenols in treatments A, B and C were high in young, and low in old leaves; whereas in treatment D they were low and similar between leaves of different ages.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15652578     DOI: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2004.11.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phytochemistry        ISSN: 0031-9422            Impact factor:   4.072


  7 in total

1.  Ingestion and Absorption of Eucalypt Monoterpenes in the Specialist Feeder, the Koala (Phascolarctos cinereus).

Authors:  Caroline Marschner; Mark B Krockenberger; Damien P Higgins; Christopher Mitchell; Ben D Moore
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2019-08-17       Impact factor: 2.626

2.  Quantifying the response of free-ranging mammalian herbivores to the interplay between plant defense and nutrient concentrations.

Authors:  Miguel A Bedoya-Pérez; Daniel D Issa; Peter B Banks; Clare McArthur
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2014-06-13       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  How do soil nutrients affect within-plant patterns of herbivory in seedlings of Eucalyptus nitens?

Authors:  Prue E Loney; Clare McArthur; Gordon D Sanson; Noel W Davies; Dugald C Close; Gregory J Jordan
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2006-10-10       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Specific polyphenols and tannins are associated with defense against insect herbivores in the tropical oak Quercus oleoides.

Authors:  Coral Moctezuma; Almuth Hammerbacher; Martin Heil; Jonathan Gershenzon; Rodrigo Méndez-Alonzo; Ken Oyama
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 2.626

5.  Species by environment interactions affect pyrrolizidine alkaloid expression in Senecio jacobaea, Senecio aquaticus, and their hybrids.

Authors:  Heather Kirk; Klaas Vrieling; Eddy Van Der Meijden; Peter G L Klinkhamer
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2010-03-23       Impact factor: 2.626

6.  Insect herbivory in a mature Eucalyptus woodland canopy depends on leaf phenology but not CO2 enrichment.

Authors:  Andrew N Gherlenda; Ben D Moore; Anthony M Haigh; Scott N Johnson; Markus Riegler
Journal:  BMC Ecol       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 2.964

7.  Quantitative and qualitative shifts in defensive metabolites define chemical defense investment during leaf development in Inga, a genus of tropical trees.

Authors:  Natasha L Wiggins; Dale L Forrister; María-José Endara; Phyllis D Coley; Thomas A Kursar
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 2.912

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.