Literature DB >> 15652318

The neural correlates of spatial language in English and American Sign Language: a PET study with hearing bilinguals.

Karen Emmorey1, Thomas Grabowski, Stephen McCullough, Laura L B Ponto, Richard D Hichwa, Hanna Damasio.   

Abstract

Rather than specifying spatial relations with a closed-class set of prepositions, American Sign Language (ASL) encodes spatial relations using space itself via classifier constructions. In these constructions, handshape morphemes specify object type, and the position of the hands in signing space schematically represents the spatial relation between objects. A [15O]water PET study was conducted to investigate the neural regions engaged during the production of English prepositions and ASL locative classifier constructions in hearing subjects with deaf parents (ASL-English bilinguals). Ten subjects viewed line drawings depicting a spatial relation between two objects and were asked to produce either an ASL locative classifier construction or an English preposition that described the spatial relation. The comparison task was to name the figure object (colored red) in either ASL or in English. Describing spatial relations in either ASL or English engaged parietal cortex bilaterally. However, an interaction analysis revealed that right superior parietal cortex was engaged to a greater extent for ASL than for English. We propose that right parietal cortex is involved in the visual-motoric transformation required for ASL. The production of both English prepositions and ASL nouns engaged Broca's area to a greater extent than ASL classifier constructions. We suggest that Broca's area is not engaged because these constructions do not involve retrieval of the name of an object or the name of a spatial relation. Finally, under the same task conditions, only left parietal activation was observed for monolingual English speakers producing spatial prepositions (H. Damasio et al., 2001, NeuroImage, 13). We conclude that the right hemisphere activation observed for ASL-English bilinguals was due to their life-long experience with spatial language in ASL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15652318     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.10.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  29 in total

1.  Altered intra- and inter-regional synchronization of superior temporal cortex in deaf people.

Authors:  Yanyan Li; James R Booth; Danling Peng; Yufeng Zang; Junhong Li; Chaogan Yan; Guosheng Ding
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  The Cognitive Neuroscience of Sign Language: Engaging Undergraduate Students' Critical Thinking Skills Using the Primary Literature.

Authors:  Courtney Stevens
Journal:  J Undergrad Neurosci Educ       Date:  2015-10-15

3.  Architectures, representations and processes of language production.

Authors:  F-Xavier Alario; Albert Costa; Victor S Ferreira; Martin J Pickering
Journal:  Lang Cogn Process       Date:  2006-10

4.  Co-speech gesture in bimodal bilinguals.

Authors:  Shannon Casey; Karen Emmorey
Journal:  Lang Cogn Process       Date:  2008-02

5.  Activation of sensory-motor areas in sentence comprehension.

Authors:  Rutvik H Desai; Jeffrey R Binder; Lisa L Conant; Mark S Seidenberg
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2009-06-22       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  Giving speech a hand: gesture modulates activity in auditory cortex during speech perception.

Authors:  Amy L Hubbard; Stephen M Wilson; Daniel E Callan; Mirella Dapretto
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 7.  The bimodal bilingual brain: effects of sign language experience.

Authors:  Karen Emmorey; Stephen McCullough
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2008-05-08       Impact factor: 2.381

8.  Sensitive period for white-matter connectivity of superior temporal cortex in deaf people.

Authors:  Yanyan Li; Guosheng Ding; James R Booth; Ruiwang Huang; Yating Lv; Yufeng Zang; Yong He; Danling Peng
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-03-09       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  Bilateral parietal contributions to spatial language.

Authors:  Julie Conder; Julius Fridriksson; Gordon C Baylis; Cameron M Smith; Timothy W Boiteau; Amit Almor
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 2.381

10.  The biology of linguistic expression impacts neural correlates for spatial language.

Authors:  Karen Emmorey; Stephen McCullough; Sonya Mehta; Laura L B Ponto; Thomas J Grabowski
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.