Literature DB >> 15652307

Cerebral activation using a MR-compatible piezoelectric actuator with adjustable vibration frequencies and in vivo wave propagation control.

Elke R Gizewski1, Oezlem Koeze, Kai Uffmann, Armin de Greiff, Mark E Ladd, Michael Forsting.   

Abstract

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies are increasingly used in patients with brain tumors near the sensory motor cortex for planning of therapy. Passive stimuli can be helpful for reproducible results. The purpose of our study was to investigate frequency and amplitude dependencies of cerebral activation patterns using a vibratory stimulus that involves sensory and motor function and allows exact adjustment of vibratory frequencies and direct control of penetration depth into the tissue. Fifteen volunteers were studied with fMRI during vibratory stimulation of the right biceps muscle utilizing a block design (frequencies: 150 and 300 Hz, amplitudes: 400, 600, and 800 microm). In addition, visualization of the wave propagation into the biceps tissue itself was performed with a modified phase contrast sequence. A specially developed MR-compatible mechanical oscillator was used to apply the vibrotactile sensations. fMRI revealed activation of the left primary somatosensory cortex during application of both vibratory frequencies. Additionally, activity of the primary and supplementary motor cortex was revealed using 150-Hz stimuli, while only minimal at 300 Hz. The activity strength correlated with increasing stimulus amplitudes and the visualized penetration depth. Activation of motor areas was more pronounced at the beginning of the rest period. In conclusion, sensory motor areas can be activated using a piezoelectric actuator, with less pronounced motor area activation at higher frequencies. Our setup allowed local control of stimulus penetration through the tissue correlated to central activation, providing objective stimulus control. The pronounced activation of the motor cortex during the rest condition may reflect the subjective feeling of arm movement after the end of the stimulus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15652307     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.09.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  10 in total

1.  Novel magnetomechanical MR compatible vibrational device for producing kinesthetic illusion during fMRI.

Authors:  Sarah J Carr; Kristin Borreggine; Jeremiah Heilman; Mark Griswold; Benjamin L Walter
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Effects of wrist tendon vibration on arm tracking in people poststroke.

Authors:  Megan O Conrad; Robert A Scheidt; Brian D Schmit
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-06-22       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Time-harmonic magnetic resonance elastography of the normal feline brain.

Authors:  A J Pattison; S S Lollis; P R Perriñez; I M Perreard; M D J McGarry; J B Weaver; K D Paulsen
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-07-23       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Cortical brain responses during passive nonpainful median nerve stimulation at low frequencies (0.5-4 Hz): an fMRI study.

Authors:  Antonio Ferretti; Claudio Babiloni; Donatello Arienzo; Cosimo Del Gratta; Paolo Maria Rossini; Armando Tartaro; Gian Luca Romani
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Neural substrates of reliability-weighted visual-tactile multisensory integration.

Authors:  Michael S Beauchamp; Siavash Pasalar; Tony Ro
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2010-06-23

6.  A new vibrator to stimulate muscle proprioceptors in fMRI.

Authors:  Marie Montant; Patricia Romaiguère; Jean-Pierre Roll
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  A study on observed ultrasonic motor-induced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) artifacts.

Authors:  Peyman Shokrollahi; James M Drake; Andrew A Goldenberg
Journal:  Biomed J       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 4.910

8.  A Simple and Compact MR-Compatible Electromagnetic Vibrotactile Stimulator.

Authors:  Xinjian Jiang; Yueqian Wang; Xiaojin Li; Liping Wang; Yong-Di Zhou; Huimin Wang
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-01-17       Impact factor: 4.677

9.  Movement and afferent representations in human motor areas: a simultaneous neuroimaging and transcranial magnetic/peripheral nerve-stimulation study.

Authors:  H Shitara; T Shinozaki; K Takagishi; M Honda; T Hanakawa
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Effects of 8-week sensory electrical stimulation combined with motor training on EEG-EMG coherence and motor function in individuals with stroke.

Authors:  Li-Ling Hope Pan; Wen-Wen Yang; Chung-Lan Kao; Mei-Wun Tsai; Shun-Hwa Wei; Felipe Fregni; Vincent Chiun-Fan Chen; Li-Wei Chou
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.