Literature DB >> 15652224

Scientific authorship. Part 1. A window into scientific fraud?

Larry D Claxton1.   

Abstract

The examination of a single scientific manuscript seldom alerts scientists, reviewers, editors, and scientific administrators to the fabrication and falsification of data and information. This review shows that most documented cases of scientific fraud involve falsification (altering truthful information) and fabrication (inventing information where none previously existed). Plagiarism is much less frequent. The review of published accounts also shows that the publication of scientific papers containing recognizable fraudulent material is very low, probably less than 0.02% and extremely difficult to detect. Because most reported cases of fraud have involved research done at prestigious organizations with distinguished co-authors, and that is published in journals with exacting review processes, it becomes evident that some unscrupulous scientists are adept at fabricating and falsifying data. However, "significant" scientific fraud is detected when scientists repeatedly report results that cannot be independently verified, when colleagues report suspicious behavior, or scientific audits are performed. This review documents and compares many of the better-known cases of scientific fraud. Fraudulent behavior has served as the impetus for the scientific community to develop publication procedures and guidelines that help to guard against not only fraudulent behavior but also against other types of unethical or undesirable behaviors. A companion paper reviews the non-fraudulent issues associated with scientific publication.

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15652224     DOI: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2004.07.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  34 in total

Review 1.  Research misconduct and data fraud in clinical trials: prevalence and causal factors.

Authors:  Stephen L George
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 2.  Scientific misconduct: a perspective from India.

Authors:  Husain Sabir; Subhash Kumbhare; Amit Parate; Rajesh Kumar; Suroopa Das
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2015-05

3.  Are the authors listed on that paper really the authors?

Authors:  Ana Marusic
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2005-12-19

4.  Five-Year Report of Croatian Medical Journal's Research Integrity Editor - Policy, Policing, or Policing Policy.

Authors:  Vedran Katavic
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.351

5.  Authorship versus "credit" for participation in research: a case study of potential ethical dilemmas created by technical tools used by researchers and claims for authorship by their creators.

Authors:  James A Welker; Jack D McCue
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2006-10-26       Impact factor: 4.497

6.  Reliability of disclosure forms of authors' contributions.

Authors:  Vesna Ilakovac; Kristina Fister; Matko Marusic; Ana Marusic
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2007-01-02       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  Croatia founded a national body for ethics in science.

Authors:  Livia Puljak
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2007-04-11       Impact factor: 3.525

8.  The implications of fraud in medical and scientific research.

Authors:  Alistair A P Slesser; Yassar A Qureshi
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Plagiarism: words and ideas.

Authors:  Mathieu Bouville
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.525

10.  How frequently do allegations of scientific misconduct occur in ecology and evolution, and what happens afterwards?

Authors:  Gregorio Moreno-Rueda
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2011-06-26       Impact factor: 3.525

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.