Literature DB >> 15652145

Unifying temperature effects on the growth rate of bacteria and the stability of globular proteins.

David A Ratkowsky1, June Olley, Tom Ross.   

Abstract

The specific growth rate constant for bacterial growth does not obey the Arrhenius-type kinetics displayed by simple chemical reactions. Instead, for bacteria, steep convex curves are observed on an Arrhenius plot at the low- and high-temperature ends of the biokinetic range, with a region towards the middle of the growth range loosely approximating linearity. This central region has been considered by microbiologists to be the "normal physiological range" for bacterial growth, a concept whose meaningfulness we now question. We employ a kinetic model incorporating thermodynamic terms for temperature-induced enzyme denaturation, central to which is a term to account for the large positive heat capacity change during unfolding of the proteins within the bacteria. It is now widely believed by biophysicists that denaturation of complex proteins and/or other macromolecules is due to hydrophobic hydration of non-polar compounds. Denaturation is seen as the process by which enthalpic and entropic forces becomes imbalanced both at high and at low temperatures resulting in conformational changes in the enzyme structure that expose hydrophobic amino acid groups to the surrounding water molecules. The "thermodynamic" rate model, incorporating the heat capacity change and its effect on the enthalpy and entropy of the system, fitted 35 sets of data for psychrophilic, psychrotrophic, mesophilic and thermophilic bacteria well, resulting in biologically meaningful estimates for the important thermodynamic parameters. As these results mirror those obtained by biophysicists for globular proteins, it appears that the same or a similar mechanism applies to bacteria as applies to proteins.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15652145     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2004.10.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Theor Biol        ISSN: 0022-5193            Impact factor:   2.691


  25 in total

1.  Thermal adaptation of viruses and bacteria.

Authors:  Peiqiu Chen; Eugene I Shakhnovich
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-04-07       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 2.  Psychrophilic microorganisms: challenges for life.

Authors:  Salvino D'Amico; Tony Collins; Jean-Claude Marx; Georges Feller; Charles Gerday
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 8.807

3.  Variation in universal temperature dependence of biological rates.

Authors:  Raymond B Huey; Joel G Kingsolver
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-06-16       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  How do thermophilic proteins and proteomes withstand high temperature?

Authors:  Lucas Sawle; Kingshuk Ghosh
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Systematic variation in the temperature dependence of physiological and ecological traits.

Authors:  Anthony I Dell; Samraat Pawar; Van M Savage
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-05-23       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Quantifying thermal extremes and biological variation to predict evolutionary responses to changing climate.

Authors:  Joel G Kingsolver; Lauren B Buckley
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Erroneous Arrhenius: modified arrhenius model best explains the temperature dependence of ectotherm fitness.

Authors:  Jennifer L Knies; Joel G Kingsolver
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.926

8.  Predicting phenological shifts in a changing climate.

Authors:  Katherine Scranton; Priyanga Amarasekare
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Latitudinal directionality in ectotherm invasion success.

Authors:  Priyanga Amarasekare; Margaret W Simon
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Cellular proteomes have broad distributions of protein stability.

Authors:  Kingshuk Ghosh; Ken Dill
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 4.033

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.