Literature DB >> 15651765

Thrombolytic therapy for myocardial infarction facilitated by mobile coronary care.

C Wilson1, S O'Mullan, M Moore, M McCarthy.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The benefit of Thrombolytic Therapy (TT) for acute myocardial infarction is time sensitive. In Northern Ireland widespread availability of mobile coronary care units facilitates delivery of TT to heart attack victims. This region-wide prospective observational study assessed the efficacy of various methods of delivery of TT.
METHODS: All 15 acute hospitals providing acute coronary care in Northern Ireland participated and data were collected prospectively over six months on all patients admitted with acute myocardial infarction or who received TT. The information was analysed regarding appropriateness of TT, methods and timeliness of delivery of TT and mortality rates. Performance was measured against National Service Framework standards.
FINDINGS: Of 1638 patients with acute myocardial infarction 584 were considered eligible for TT and 494 (85 %) received it, in addition to 18 patients without infarction. Of the 512 thrombolysed patients 282 (55%) were treated in hospital coronary care units, 131 (26%) were treated pre-hospital, 97 (19%) in accident and emergency departments, and two in general medical wards. Overall median call-to-needle time was 87 (7-1110) mins and this was shortest for pre-hospital treatment when 55% of call-to-needle times were < or = 60 mins. For patients treated in hospital median door-to-needle time was 46 (0-1065) mins and this was shortest when TT was administered by accident and emergency staff, when 65% of door-to-needle times were < or = 30 mins. In patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction TT was associated with lower mortality, especially when administered pre-hospital.
INTERPRETATION: NSF targets for TT are unlikely to be met in Northern Ireland without increasing pre-hospital delivery of TT and by improving collaboration between coronary care and accident and emergency staff with TT availability in accident and emergency departments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15651765      PMCID: PMC2475470     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ulster Med J        ISSN: 0041-6193


  25 in total

1.  Mortality and prehospital thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  L J Morrison; P R Verbeek; A C McDonald; B V Sawadsky; D J Cook
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000 May 24-31       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Practice variation and missed opportunities for reperfusion in ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction: findings from the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE).

Authors:  Kim A Eagle; Shaun G Goodman; Alvaro Avezum; Andrzej Budaj; Cynthia M Sullivan; José López-Sendón
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-02-02       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  National service framework for coronary heart disease: audit of English hospitals.

Authors:  Michelle Rhodes; Christopher Newman; Susan Read
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-03-23

4.  Impact of changing diagnostic criteria on incidence, management, and outcome of acute myocardial infarction: retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  J P Pell; E Simpson; J C Rodger; A Finlayson; D Clark; J Anderson; A C H Pell
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-01-18

5.  Interaction between arrival time and thrombolytic treatment in determining early outcome of acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  J Wilkinson; K Foo; N Sekhri; J Cooper; A Suliman; K Ranjadayalan; A D Timmis
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 5.994

6.  Should the electrocardiogram be used to guide therapy for patients with left bundle-branch block and suspected myocardial infarction?

Authors:  M G Shlipak; W L Lyons; A S Go; T M Chou; G T Evans; W S Browner
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-02-24       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Differences in the diagnosis of myocardial infarction by troponin T compared with clinical and epidemiologic criteria.

Authors:  H Koukkunen; K Penttilä; A Kemppainen; I Penttilä; M O Halinen; T Rantanen; K Pyörälä
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2001-10-01       Impact factor: 2.778

8.  Prospective observational cohort study of time saved by prehospital thrombolysis for ST elevation myocardial infarction delivered by paramedics.

Authors:  David K Pedley; Kim Bissett; Elizabeth M Connolly; Carol G Goodman; Ian Golding; T H Pringle; G P McNeill; S D Pringle; M C Jones
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-07-05

9.  Evaluation of the time saved by prehospital initiation of reteplase for ST-elevation myocardial infarction: results of The Early Retavase-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (ER-TIMI) 19 trial.

Authors:  David A Morrow; Elliott M Antman; Assaad Sayah; Kristin C Schuhwerk; Robert P Giugliano; James A deLemos; Michael Waller; Sidney A Cohen; Donald G Rosenberg; Sally S Cutler; Carolyn H McCabe; Ron M Walls; Eugene Braunwald
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2002-07-03       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 10.  Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative review of 23 randomised trials.

Authors:  Ellen C Keeley; Judith A Boura; Cindy L Grines
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-01-04       Impact factor: 79.321

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.