Literature DB >> 15651575

Electrocardiographic motion artifact versus electrode impedance.

Scott R Wiese1, Paul Anheier, Rafael D Connemara, Anna T Mollner, Thomas F Neils, Joshua A Kahn, John G Webster.   

Abstract

We degraded electrocardiographic electrodes by exposing them to air for four days and evaluated them on 12 subjects. After application, we recorded the electrocardiogram (including motion artifact), missed QRS detections and electrode impedance during 5 min of arm and body movements. Missed QRS detections increased with electrode impedance but correlation was poor. Increased electrode impedance was not a reliable predictor of a poor electrode and the need to replace it.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15651575     DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2004.836503

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0018-9294            Impact factor:   4.538


  3 in total

Review 1.  Mechanomyographic amplitude and frequency responses during dynamic muscle actions: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Travis W Beck; Terry J Housh; Joel T Cramer; Joseph P Weir; Glen O Johnson; Jared W Coburn; Moh H Malek; Michelle Mielke
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2005-12-19       Impact factor: 2.819

2.  Effect of pressure and padding on motion artifact of textile electrodes.

Authors:  Alper Cömert; Markku Honkala; Jari Hyttinen
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 2.819

3.  Ultra-conformal drawn-on-skin electronics for multifunctional motion artifact-free sensing and point-of-care treatment.

Authors:  Faheem Ershad; Anish Thukral; Jiping Yue; Phillip Comeaux; Yuntao Lu; Hyunseok Shim; Kyoseung Sim; Nam-In Kim; Zhoulyu Rao; Ross Guevara; Luis Contreras; Fengjiao Pan; Yongcao Zhang; Ying-Shi Guan; Pinyi Yang; Xu Wang; Peng Wang; Xiaoyang Wu; Cunjiang Yu
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 14.919

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.