Literature DB >> 15650738

The simplicity of metazoan cell lineages.

Ricardo B R Azevedo1, Rolf Lohaus, Volker Braun, Markus Gumbel, Muralikrishna Umamaheshwar, Paul-Michael Agapow, Wouter Houthoofd, Ute Platzer, Gaëtan Borgonie, Hans-Peter Meinzer, Armand M Leroi.   

Abstract

Developmental processes are thought to be highly complex, but there have been few attempts to measure and compare such complexity across different groups of organisms. Here we introduce a measure of biological complexity based on the similarity between developmental and computer programs. We define the algorithmic complexity of a cell lineage as the length of the shortest description of the lineage based on its constituent sublineages. We then use this measure to estimate the complexity of the embryonic lineages of four metazoan species from two different phyla. We find that these cell lineages are significantly simpler than would be expected by chance. Furthermore, evolutionary simulations show that the complexity of the embryonic lineages surveyed is near that of the simplest lineages evolvable, assuming strong developmental constraints on the spatial positions of cells and stabilizing selection on cell number. We propose that selection for decreased complexity has played a major role in moulding metazoan cell lineages.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15650738     DOI: 10.1038/nature03178

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  10 in total

1.  A generative bias towards average complexity in artificial cell lineages.

Authors:  Rolf Lohaus; Nicholas L Geard; Janet Wiles; Ricardo B R Azevedo
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-07-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Experimental evolution of multicellularity using microbial pseudo-organisms.

Authors:  David C Queller; Joan E Strassmann
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  Embryology of a planktonic tunicate reveals traces of sessility.

Authors:  Thomas Stach; Jonas Winter; Jean-Marie Bouquet; Daniel Chourrout; Ralf Schnabel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-05-19       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Gene promoter scan methodology for identifying and classifying coregulated promoters.

Authors:  Igor Zwir; Oscar Harari; Eduardo A Groisman
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.600

5.  Evolution of embryonic development in nematodes.

Authors:  Jens Schulze; Einhard Schierenberg
Journal:  Evodevo       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 2.250

6.  Data-Theoretical Synthesis of the Early Developmental Process.

Authors:  Bradly Alicea; Richard Gordon; Thomas E Portegys
Journal:  Neuroinformatics       Date:  2021-01-15

7.  Lineage space and the propensity of bacterial cells to undergo growth transitions.

Authors:  Arnab Bandyopadhyay; Huijing Wang; J Christian J Ray
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 4.475

8.  Determinative developmental cell lineages are robust to cell deaths.

Authors:  Jian-Rong Yang; Shuxiang Ruan; Jianzhi Zhang
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 5.917

9.  Quantifying Mosaic Development: Towards an Evo-Devo Postmodern Synthesis of the Evolution of Development via Differentiation Trees of Embryos.

Authors:  Bradly Alicea; Richard Gordon
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2016-08-18

10.  Symmetry and simplicity spontaneously emerge from the algorithmic nature of evolution.

Authors:  Iain G Johnston; Kamaludin Dingle; Sam F Greenbury; Chico Q Camargo; Jonathan P K Doye; Sebastian E Ahnert; Ard A Louis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 12.779

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.